Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Funderburk v. Funderburk, 38 So. 2d 502.

46 citing documents.

Succession Of Willie Clyde Burns La. 2022
5 Courts have defined good faith in the context of putative marriage as “the honest and reasonable belief that the marriage at the time of its confection was a valid one.” (La.
Succession of Willie C. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Wilma Young Baker v. John Burr Baker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
So.2d 502 (La.1949), (La.App.
Baker v. Baker 27 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Saacks v. Saacks 688 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Rebouche v. Anderson 505 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Mara v. Mara 452 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
(1949); Succession of Chavis, 211 La.
Freet v. Freet 442 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Zanders v. Heirs of Zanders 434 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Gathright v. Smith, supra; , (1949).
Hart v. Hart 427 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Deliberto v. Deliberto 400 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Galbraith v. Galbraith 396 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Gathright v. Smith 368 So. 2d 679 La. 1979
See, e. g., , (1949); Succession of Chavis, 211 La.
Connell v. Connell 316 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
and cases cited therein."
TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 308 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
See: , , and cases therein cited."
Succession of Broussard 306 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
310 , (1952); , (1949); Succession of Chavis, 211 La.
Woodward v. Lewis 292 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Art. 1539; , (1949), and the authorities therein cited.
Eddy v. Eddy 271 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Succession of Brewster 259 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
(2d Cir. 1960); , (1949).
Simon v. Trahan 235 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
2d 861 ; , ; Vela v. Slavich, La.App.
Succession of Oulliber v. Oulliber 204 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Vela v. Slavich 185 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Jones v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of US 173 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Succession of Davis 142 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Smith v. Garrison 137 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Simon v. Simon 138 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
463 , (1945); , (1949); Abunza v. Olivier, 230 La.
Bennett v. Markley 138 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In Re Succession of Rusciana 136 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Payton v. Jones, La.App., 38 So.
Giamanco v. Giamanco 131 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
1073 , ; , ; LSA-Civil Code, Article 2408.
Succession of Primus 131 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Winston v. Winston 130 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
463 , ; , ; Williams v. Williams, 215 La.
Succession of McCrocklin 126 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
37 , ; Funderburk v. Funderburk, 1949, , .
Chrisentery v. Chrisentery 124 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
506 ; , ; Abunza v. Olivier, 230 La.
Odom v. Odom 121 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
In Funderburk v. Funderburk, 1949, , , a resume of the law apropos to this issue is set forth thus: "Under the Revised Civil Code, a husband can give his wife, when he has children by a former marriage, only that portion of his estate that he could give to a stranger (Article 1752; Succession of Byrnes, 206 La.
Succession of Hopkins 114 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Succession of Marinoni, 183 La.
Succession of Rusciana 96 So. 2d 1 La. 1957
we held as follows: “There must be taken into consideration, also, the repairs that were made during the existence of the community to the separate property of the husband, used and enjoyed by them as a home, although the recompense due for such repairs is not based upon the actual amounts expend
Abunza v. Olivier 88 So. 2d 815 La. 1956
463 , ; , ; Williams v. Williams, 215 La.
Abraham v. Abraham 87 So. 2d 735 La. 1956
Succession of Pigg 84 So. 2d 196 La. 1955
Succession of Woolfolk 71 So. 2d 861 La. 1954
and cases therein cited.
Succession of Verrett 70 So. 2d 89 La. 1953
In other words, where a man' and woman live together as husband and wife, there is a presumption that they have been validly married, and that a marriage, although in fact null, was contracted in good faith.’” See also: , 38 * Ray v. Knox, 164 La.
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
463 , ; , ; (5) there is nothing in the record to justify the finding that the community is indebted to the separate estate of the husband for the full book value of the building of Coney Equipment Company.
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
463 , ; , ; (5) there is nothing in the record to justify the finding that the community is indebted to the separate estate of the husband for the full book value of the building of Coney Equipment Company.
Eason v. Alexander Shipyards 47 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
it was said by the Supreme Court: "The good faith referred to in these articles means simply the honest and reasonable belief that the marriage at the time of its confection was a valid one.
Williams v. Williams 41 So. 2d 736 La. 1949