Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Malone v. Cannon, 41 So. 2d 837.

25 citing documents.

Angela Pickard v. amazon.com, Inc. La. 2024
have a common purpose.” (1949).
Bryan D. Scofield, Inc. v. Susan A. Daigle, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
* * *” -58, (1949)(quoting 59 Corpus Juris verbo Statutes, § 620).
Bryan D. Scofield, Inc. v. Susan A. Daigle, Ltd. 999 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
* * *" -58 , (1949) (quoting 59 Corpus Juris verbo Statutes, § 620).
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 694 So. 2d 184 La. 1997
Bourque v. Bailey 643 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
art. 13; Keelen v. State Dept. of Culture, Recreation, , (1949); (La.App.
Succession of Mullin v. Mullin 631 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
326 (1926), and Compare, , (1949).
Succession of Warner 597 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Francois v. Tufts 571 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
In re the Succession of LaBorde 540 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
This Court based on Louisiana Civil Code article 2433; the jurisprudence, Malone v. Cannon, [ ] and all the evidence finds that the wife is not entitled to the marital portion through the following reasoning.
Succession of Smith 507 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(1949); Succession of Henry, supra.
LaCroix v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 477 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
579 , , La.Civ.Code art. 17.
LaCroix v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation 477 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
579 , , La.Civ.Code art. 17.
Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism 463 So. 2d 1287 La. 1985
579 , , La.Civ.Code art. 17.
Breaux v. Domingues 407 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Succession of Lichtentag 391 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Malone v. Cannon, [ , (1949)] supra; (La.App.
Succession of Lichtentag 363 So. 2d 706 La. 1978
In re Interdiction of Langenbecker 355 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Peyrefitte v. Harvey 312 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
35 , (1952); , (1949); (La.App.
Henry v. Exchange Bank & Trust Co. 287 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Succession of Henry 287 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Succession of Harris 283 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
The issues before us arfe whether the widow meets all of the requirements of the law as set out in Civil Code article 2382 , (1949).
Bussie v. McKeithen 259 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
39:171, et seq., a , (1949), at : “Civil Code Article 17 states that, ‘Laws in pari materia, or upon the same subject matter, must be construed with a reference to each other; what is clear in one statute may be called in aid to explain what is doubtful in another.’ And in 59 Corpus Juris, verbo Statutes, Secti
Roberts v. City of Baton Rouge 108 So. 2d 111 La. 1958
State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956