No. 46585
Precedential
Processed
State v. Creamer
State v. Creamer, 149 So. 2d 763 (La. 1963).
Cited by
- Atkins v. Six C Properties, L.L.C. 55 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Hospital Service District No. 2 v. Community Bank of Lafourche 790 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Comby v. White 737 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Marsh Cattle Farms v. Vining 707 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- King v. Strohe 673 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Bidstrup v. Brignac 631 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- City of Eunice v. Sunland Properties 597 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Dunbar v. Benoit 494 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Succession of Miller v. Moss 479 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Porter v. Acadia-Vermilion Irr. Co., Inc. 479 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Ceco Corp. v. Mid-Gulf Construction, Inc. 396 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Ware v. Ware 365 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Opinion text
In re: James Creamer applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Writs denied. The showing made by relator is not sufficient to justify this Court exercising its supervisory jurisdiction.