Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Creamer, 149 So. 2d 763.
- Atkins v. Six C Properties, L.L.C. 55 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Hospital Service District No. 2 v. Community Bank of Lafourche 790 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-
Comby v. White
737 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1004 , (1963); see also Vicknair v. Perrilloux, 7 Pelt.
-
Marsh Cattle Farms v. Vining
707 So. 2d 111
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
1004 , (1963); Meaux v. Southdown Lands, Inc., (La.App.
- King v. Strohe 673 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Bidstrup v. Brignac
631 So. 2d 637
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
3d Cir.1962), writ refused, (1963), should be considered to determine the interest the parties intended to convey by use of extrinsic evidence.
-
City of Eunice v. Sunland Properties
597 So. 2d 1198
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3d Cir. 1962), writ denied, citing Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co., (La.
-
Dunbar v. Benoit
494 So. 2d 341
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
3d Cir.1962), writ refused
-
Succession of Miller v. Moss
479 So. 2d 1035
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2nd Cir.1962), writ refused, , 243 La.
- Porter v. Acadia-Vermilion Irr. Co., Inc. 479 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Ceco Corp. v. Mid-Gulf Construction, Inc. 396 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Ware v. Ware
365 So. 2d 842
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
2 Cir. 1962, , writ refused , ; see also Pennison v. Pennison, La.App.
-
Meaux v. Southdown Lands, Inc.
361 So. 2d 974
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
1004 , (1963); Esso Standard Oil Company v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, (La.App.
- Bank of Louisiana in New Orleans v. Campbell 329 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
- WR Aldrich & Company v. Spalitta 285 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
-
Armstrong v. RED RIVER, ATCHAFALAYA, ETC., LEVEE BD.
278 So. 2d 496
La. 1973
1004 , (1963); Kaffie v. *498 Pioneer Bank & Trust Co., La.App., (1965).