DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clinton v. City of West Monroe, 187 So. 561.

22 citing documents.

  • Powell v. Heck 378 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    1st Cir. 1967); (La.App.
  • Skinner v. Nightingale 377 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Pickens v. St. Tammany Parish Police Jury 323 So. 2d 430 La. 1975
  • McDaniel v. Welsh 234 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    2 Cir., at page 564) apply equally whether the maintenance of the city streets is done by a combined city-parish street department or by the city itself.
  • LeJeune v. State, Department of Highways 215 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Hall v. State, Department of Highways 213 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    See also (facts very similar to the present):
  • Johnson v. Gill 148 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., .
  • Cook v. City of Shreveport 134 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Brown v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 126 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    388 , , overrule the jurisprudence established in Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., , as well as all subsequent cases recognizing the exception to the general rule of governmental immunity which holds municipalities liable for damages occasioned by failure to repair or maintain public streets and sidewalks.
  • Carlisle v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 114 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
  • Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 107 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Counsel for plaintiff also relies greatly upon the case of Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., , which we believe is easily distinguished from the case at bar.
  • Bourg v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 77 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    598 ; Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., , on the ground that the cited cases show a higher state of intoxication or drunkenness.
  • Prunty v. City of Shreveport 61 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    This exception is noted, carefully analyzed and supported by numerous citations in the opinion of the late Judge Taliaferro in Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., (writs refused March 6, 1939).
  • Elba v. Thomas 59 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    598 ; Clinton v. [City of] West Monroe [La.App.], ; 27 Minn.Law Rev. 349."
  • Rosier v. State 50 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., .
  • McClung v. Town of Winnfield 46 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    this Court gave mature consideration to the principle here discussed.
  • Mercier v. Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York 10 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    129 ; Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., .
  • German v. City of New Orleans 3 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    See, also, Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., ; followed in Willis v. City of West Monroe, La.App., 187 So.
  • Floyes Ex Rel. Floyes v. City of Monroe 194 So. 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    Clinton v. City of West Monroe, La.App., , and authorities therein cited; Todaro v. City of Shreveport et al., La.App., 170 So.
  • Madden v. City of West Monroe 187 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    This case grew out of the same accident involved in the suit on the docket of this court, decided today, styled Harry P. Clinton, , and for the reasons therein assigned, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff’s cost.
  • Perritt v. City of West Monroe 187 So. 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    This cáse grew out of the same accident involved in the suit on the docket of this court, decided today, styled Harry P. Clinton, Tutor, v. City of West Monroe, , and for the reasons therein assigned, 'the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff’s cost.
  • Willis v. City of West Monroe 187 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    This case grew out of the same accident involved in the suit on the docket of this court decided today, styled Harry P. Clinton, Tutor, v. City of West Monroe, ; and for the reasons therein assigned, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff’s cost.