Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fagot, 361 So. 2d 226.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Nancy Rogers A/K/A Nancy Lynn Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
which involved the failure to record a portion of the hearing on a motion for change of venue; concerning 54 the lack of a transcript of closing arguments when one of the defendant’s assignments of error pertained to the state’s closing argument; and State v. Murphy, 13-509 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Dangelo Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Again, reversal was required when the transcript of the closing argument could not be prepared and the defendant assigned as error the State’s closing argument.
State of Louisiana v. Erick Gail Gragg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Again, reversal was required when the transcript of the closing argument could not be prepared and defendant assigned as error the State’s closing argument.
State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
1267, 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1977), where the Louisiana Supreme Court found the omission of a portion of the hearing on a motion for change of venue was not an “inconsequential omission” and required reversal because it was impossible to assess the existence of community prejudice or to ascertain whether the evidence supported the defendant’s contention that the motion was improvidently denied; (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1977), where the Louisiana Supreme Court found the omission of a portion of the hearing on a motion for change of venue was not an “inconsequential omission” and required reversal because it was impossible to assess the existence of community prejudice or to ascertain whether the evidence supported the defendant’s contention that the motion was improvidently denied; (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1977), where the Louisiana Supreme Court found the omission of a portion of the hearing on a motion for change of venue was not an “inconsequential omission” and required reversal because it was impossible to assess the existence of community prejudice or to ascertain whether the evidence supported the defendant’s contention that the motion was improvidently denied; (La.
State in the Interest of J.C.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1267, 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State ex rel. J.C.R. 157 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999); *1287 227 (La.1978).
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
1267, 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Higginbotham 122 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
In support of the reversal of defendant’s conviction, and State v. Rooney, 187 La.
State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1267, 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1267, 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Cheatteam 986 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999); (La.
State v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Boatner 861 So. 2d 149 La. 2003
1267 , 143 L.Ed.2d 362 (1999)
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
[24] State v. Landry, 97-0499 (La.6/29/99), -216
State v. Landry 751 So. 2d 214 La. 1999
Again, reversal was required when the transcript of the closing argument could not be prepared and defendant assigned as error the State's closing argument.
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
State v. Goodbier 367 So. 2d 356 La. 1979
State v. Rooney, 187 La.