Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Singleton v. Executive Officers of Atlas Construction Co., 369 So. 2d 699.

90 citing documents.

Ngoc Troung v. Marcus Dewayne Sanders and Old American Indemnity Company La. 2025
owner of condemned or damaged property be compensated with the market value of the property taken and severance damage to his remainder, but that he be “compensated to the full extent of his loss” and “placed in as good a position pecuniarily as [he] enjoyed prior to the taking.”
State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation & Development v. Mark Eric Milligan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Parish of Livingston v. A&M Investment Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Giovanni Mucciacciaro La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Bayou Bridge Pipeline, Llc v. 38.00 Acres, More Or Less La. 2021
It has long been recognized, including by this court, that the 1974 constitution significantly expanded the concept of compensation by adding to the expropriation provision the requirement that the owner be compensated to the “full extent of his loss.” See, e.g., State Through Dep’t -02 (La.
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
compensated with the market value of the property taken and severance damage to his remainder, but that he be “compensated to the full extent of his loss” and “placed in as good a position pecuniarily as [he] enjoyed prior to the taking.”
Bayou Bridge Pipeline, LLC v. 38.00 Acres, More or Less, Located in St. Martin Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Univ. v. Gerson 260 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
14-1277, p. 10, 183 So.3d at 764 (citing State Dept. of Highways v. Constant , (La.
St. Bernard Port v. Violet Dock Port, Inc. 255 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Const. Art. I, § 4 (B)(5) , 701-702 (La.
ST. BERNARD PORT, HARBOR & TERMINAL DISTRICT v. VIOLET DOCK PORT, INC., LLC St. Bernard Port, Harbor & … 239 So. 3d 243 La. 2018
Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government v. Richard 196 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Board of Supervisors v. Villavaso 183 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
Sandrock v. St. Bernard Parish Government 171 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State Dept. of Highways v. Bitterwolf
City of Baton Rouge v. Nelson 166 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
City of Baton Rouge v. Jay’s Donuts, Inc., 13-1722 (La.App.
Parish of Jefferson v. Powerline, LLC 131 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
In brief, for the proposition that it is to be compensated to the full extent of its loss, which it alleges on appeal is $261,898.00.
Orleans Parish School Board v. State, Division of Administration 177 So. 3d 711 La. 2013
STATE EX REL. DOTD v. Wade 984 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The supreme court first recognized replacement cost as an acceptable measure of just compensation in State
State of La, Thru the Dotd v. David Wade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The supreme court first recognized replacement cost as an acceptable measure of just compensation in State, through the Dep’t
State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Wade 984 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
The supreme court first recognized replacement cost as an acceptable measure of just compensation in State, through the Dep’t
Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu 903 So. 2d 392 La. 2005
1 Cir.1978), amended and affirmed on other grounds
Avenal v. State 886 So. 2d 1085 La. 2004
v. Dietrich, -59 (La.1990); State, (the purpose of the additional language in Article I, § 4 was to compensate an owner for any loss sustained by reason of the taking, and not merely restricted as under the former constitution to the market value of the property taken and to reduction in the market value of the remainder).
Avenal v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 858 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See State, State, Dept. of Transp.
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Broussard 834 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 788 So. 2d 1154 La. 2001
v. Dietrich, -59 (La.1990); (the purpose of the additional language in Article I, Section 4 was to compensate an owner for any loss sustained by reason of the taking, and not merely restricted as under the former constitution to the market value of the property taken and to reduction in the market value of the remainder).
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. LeBlanc 763 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 763 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. G & B Oil Products, Inc. 762 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Relying on the holding in State, Through Dep’t DOTD contends that before an owner of expropriated property can recover-for a business loss, he must prove that his land is unique in nature and location as well as indispensable to his business, and in this- case G & B failed to do so.
Avenal v. State 757 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Franklin Southland Printing v. Noab 739 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 731 So. 2d 240 La. 1999
Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc. 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State Through Department of Highways v. Constand[Constant]
Sportsman Store v. SONITROL SEC. SYSTEMS 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State Through Department of Highways v. Constand [Constant]
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Oswald 665 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
v. Dietrich, State Through Dep’t
Huckabay v. Red River Waterway Com'n 663 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
1st Cir.1978), amended in part, State, Department of Transportation & (La.App.
West Jefferson Levee D. v. Coast Quality 640 So. 2d 1258 La. 1994
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Manuel 640 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
The law concerning the compensation due a landowner whose property has been expropriated is well settled: Under the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, Article I, Section 4 and the Supreme Court case of State of Louisiana, a landowner whose property is expropriated shall be compensated to the full extent of his loss, including any business or economic loss sustained by the property owner.
Layne v. City of Mandeville 633 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
that an owner must be placed in as good a position pecuniarily as he would have been had his property not been taken.
STATE, DOTD v. Morein 628 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Board of Com'rs v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 625 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
ourt noted that "the new constitutional language `has broadened the measure of damages in expropriation cases by requiring that an owner not only be paid the market value of property taken and severance damages to his remainder, but also that such an owner be put in as good a position pecuniarily as he would have been had his property not been taken.'" (quoting the majority opinion from the court of appeal, State, (La.App.
Red River Waterway Com'n v. Fry 628 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Packard's Western Store, supra; State, Dept. of Transp.
Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 618 So. 2d 874 La. 1993
Packard's Western Store, Inc. v. STATE, DOT 618 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
LeBlanc v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 615 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State Through Department of Highways v. Bitterwolf
Naquin v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. OF STATE 604 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(Business Losses) State, (Replacement Costs) State
Clayton v. State Dept. of Transp. & Development 599 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1978), affirmed and amended, , 702 (La.1979).
State Through DOTD v. Chambers Inv. Co. 595 So. 2d 598 La. 1992
v. Dietrich, -59 (La.1990); State, (La.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. Unverzagt 590 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
SEVERANCE DAMAGES "Under the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, Article I, Section 4 and the Supreme Court case of State of Louisiana, (La.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v.Griffith 585 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Soma Enterprises, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 584 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
v. Constant, Traina, supra; State, (La.App.