DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Berg v. Horne, 26 So. 2d 753.

47 citing documents.

  • Carter v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. 342 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In Butler v. O’Neal, (La.App.
  • Boles v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co. 250 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    2 Cir. 1946), : “ * * * Pre-emption of an intersection, under the principles established by our jurisprudence, does not mean the prior entry of a vehicle simply by a matter of a few feet, or, in relation to the time element, by a fraction of a second ahead of another vehicle, but, in order to support a charge of negligence, such pr
  • Meek v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    As was pointed out in Butler v. O’Neal, : “Pre-emption of an intersection, under the principles established by our jurisprudence, does not mean the prior entry of a vehicle simply by a matter of a few feet, or, in relation to the time element, by a fraction or a second ahead of another vehicle, but, in order to support a charge o
  • Earles v. Volentine 191 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    2d Cir., 1946, ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App.
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. 183 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    App., , Highland Avenue upon which plaintiff was proceeding has the *148 right-of-way over intersecting Herndon Street by virtue of defendant's admission he was faced with a stop sign before entering Highland Avenue.
  • Welch v. Welch 169 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    App., ; Cole v. Sherrill, La.
  • Whittington v. Gully 164 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Glass v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company 160 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
  • Henderson v. Travelers Indemnity Company 158 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    2d Cir., 1946, ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App.
  • Shipley v. Schittone 148 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Tresche v. Callaway 147 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Huerstel v. L. Mangano & Co., La.App., ; Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App., ; Sonnier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Chase v. Burley, La.App., ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., ; Stevens v. Delanoix, La.App., , and many other decisions cited in this Stevens opinion.
  • Mentel v. Boston Insurance Co. 144 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App., ; *446 Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., of Hartford, Conn., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ."
  • Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 137 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    This action must be followed by careful observance of traffic conditions on the right-of-way streets and no entry thereon made unless conditions clearly warrant it.” We conclude that LeBeau did not pre-empt this intersection, for as stated in Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., , 756: “Pre-emption of an intersection, under the principles established by our jurisprudence, does not mean the prior entry of a vehicle simply by a matter of a few feet, or, in relation to the time element, by a fraction of a se
  • Faucheaux v. Landry 136 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    .” There being no manifest error in the judgment appealed from the same is affirmed.
  • Hamilton v. Dalrymple 135 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    See Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.
  • Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 135 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    2d Cir., 1946, ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App.
  • Dean v. Pitts 133 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 125 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    Butler v. O'Neal, La.App.1946, ; Hooper v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Co., supra; Ehtor v. Parish, supra; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., La.App.1954, ; Gerrets v. Reed, La.App.1957, ; Moore v. Shreveport Transit Co., La.App.1959, ; Emmco Ins.
  • Saloom v. Guidry 125 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    See Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., .” The trial court, after hearing the evidence, concluded that the plaintiff did not come to a complete stop before entering the intersection, although admittedly observing the defendant’s vehicle approaching.
  • Gallioto v. Chisholm 126 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.
  • Foster v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance 118 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co. v. Levy, La.App., ; Ryan v. Allstate, La.App., ; Commercial Credit Corp. v. Serpas, La.App., ; Nix v. State Farm, La.App., ; Daly v. Employers, La.App., ; Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., .
  • Moore v. Shreveport Transit Company 115 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    As was said in Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., , 756: "Pre-emption of an intersection, under the principles established by our jurisprudence, does not mean the prior entry of a vehicle simply by a matter of a few feet, or, in relation to the time element, by a fraction of a second ahead of another vehicle, but, in order to support a charge of negligence, such pre-
  • Evans v. Walker 111 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    2d 552 ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., of Hartford, Conn., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Montalbano v. Hall 108 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ."
  • Mullins v. Seals 103 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., .” It would serve no useful purpose here to sift or analyze the evidence.
  • Frazier v. Muse 98 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    1st Cir., ; Trahan v. Lantier, La.App., ; Harrell v. Goodwin, La.App., ; Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., ; Robbins v. Mydland, La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., La.App., ; Miller v. Abshire, La.App., ; Droddy v. Southern Bus Lines, La.App., ; Broussard v. Duhon, La.App., .
  • Audubon Insurance Co. v. Lavallis 95 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., .” The evidence, we think discloses Rosa Mae Rachal did not preempt' the intersection, for at the time she entered Overton Street her vehicle was in imminent danger of being struck by the
  • Keith v. Royal Indemnity Company 90 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., La.App., ; Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App., .
  • Carlson v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance 88 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    It was also held in Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., , that when the negotiation of an intersection involves the passage across a favored thoroughfare the obligation of unusual care and caution upon the driver of vehicles on less favored thoroughfares should be enforced.
  • Martin v. Adams 88 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hardware Mut.
  • Rachow v. Ringwald 87 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Ehtor v. Parish 86 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Facio v. Bellone, La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Toups v. Trent 85 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., 1946, ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., 1950, ; Boudreaux v. Moreau, La.App., 1954, .
  • Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Parker 84 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    857 , ; Berg v. Home, La.App.1946, ; Bolton v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company, La.App.1954, .
  • Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co. 83 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    While this objection was correct, since our courts may not take judicial notice of municipal ordinances, Pacific Fire Insurance Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., , Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., , nevertheless under the facts of this case even if no favored thoroughfare was proven, nevertheless plaintiff had the right of way as a vehicle approaching from the right under LSA-R.S.
  • Robbins v. Mydland 81 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    1 Cir., ; Harrell v. Goodwin, La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Dodd v. Bass 76 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., 1946, ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., 1950, ; Boudreaux v. Moreau, La.App., 1954, .
  • Boudreaux v. Moreau 73 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Webb v. Providence Washington Ins. Co. 72 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    opinion under the facts in this case that the law announced by this court in McMorris v. Webb, La.App., , in which we quoted from Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., , is controlling, here: “ ‘Pre-emption of an intersection, under the principles established by our jurisprudence, does not mean the prior entry of a vehicle simply by a matter of a few feet, or, in relation to the time element, by a fraction of a second ahead of another vehicle, but, in order to support a charge
  • Broughton v. Touchstone 72 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ".
  • Vernaci v. Columbia Cas. Co. 71 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co., La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Bolton v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. 70 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    403 , ; Berg v. Horne, 1946, ; Graves v. D’Artois, 1946, 210 La.
  • Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn. 70 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    on a mere showing of first entrance into an intersection, we think by far the better rule, and one which is now completely accepted, clearly requires the interpretation of preemption to be the entrance of an intersection with the normal and reasonable opportunity and expectation of clearing such intersection without obstruction to the crossing thereof by other vehicles; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App.
  • McMorris v. Webb 67 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Greenwood v. Romby 51 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    App., , has well defined what is meant by preemption of an intersection.
  • Simon v. Langlinais 44 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    We have examined the cases cited by counsel for the plaintiff, namely: Scruggs v. V. Frank Lynn Co., Inc., La.App., ; Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., ; Austin v. Baker-Lawhorn & Ford, La.App., 188 So.
  • Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co. 44 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    See Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .