DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Futch v. Gregory, 40 So. 2d 830.

13 citing documents.

  • University Prop. Corp. v. Fidelity Nat. Bank 500 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Spalitta 321 So. 2d 338 La. 1975
    Corporation v. Hulett, La.App., (1963); David Investment Co. v. Wright, La.App., (1956); Futch v. Gregory, La.App., (1949); Home Finance Service v. Walmsley, La.App., 176 So.
  • Slidell Building Sup., Inc. v. IDS Mortgage Corp. 273 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    2d 605 (La.App.4th Cir. 1962)
  • Orgeron v. Griffin 230 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Home Finance Service v. Walmsley, (La.App.)
  • Pearson v. Kahey 160 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Home Finance Service v. Walmsley, [La.App.]
  • Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company 158 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    605 ; Soileau v. Pitre, La.App., ; Futch v. Gregory, La.App., .
  • MacK Trucks, Inc. v. Dixon 142 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    13:4106; Soileau v. Pitre, La.App., ; Futch v. Gregory, La.App., .
  • Hammond Finance Co. v. Carter 83 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    [1] *684 This Act has been held to prohibit a deficiency judgment when the mortgagor surrenders the mortgaged property to the mortgagee by private as well as judicial sale, "which of course, is always affected without the benefit of appraisement", Futch v. Gregory, La.App., ; see Soileau v. Pitre, La.App.
  • Wilson v. Brian 81 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    125 ; Futch v. Gregory, La.App., ; Farmer v. Smith, La.App., .
  • Soileau v. Pitre 79 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    App., , wherein the Court said: "These two decisions (the Walmsley and Lofton cases) hold that the 1934 act has application to a private sale of the mortgaged property by the mortgagee, which, of course, is always effected without the benefit of appraisement; and these holdings are based upon the public policy rule dec
  • The Farmerville Bank v. Scheen 76 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    125 , and in Futch v. Gregory, La.App., , .
  • Simmons v. Clark 64 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    The Walmsley and Lofton cases were more recently cited with approval in Futch v. Gregory, La.App., .
  • Liberal Finance Corp. v. Washington 62 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    125 and Futch v. Gregory, La.App., , would apply.