Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jacobs, 412 So. 2d 540.

56 citing documents.

State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-545 (La.1982) (“[A] police officer is not a ‘court official’; therefore, art. 770 does not apply.
State of Louisiana v. Oterrel Joseph Boutte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
e identity of the wanted person and the only inference to be drawn was that he had committed “prior other crimes.” While a mistrial is mandatory when a judge, district attorney, or court official refers to inadmissible other crimes evidence in the presence of the jury, our jurisprudence has held that a police officer is not a “court official.” (La.App.
State v. Boutte 27 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
timony removed all doubt as to the identity of the wanted person and the only inference to be drawn was that he had committed “prior other crimes.” While a mistrial is mandatory when a judge, district attorney, or court official refers to inadmissible other crimes evidence in the presence of the jury, our jurisprudence has held that a police officer is not a “court official.” (La.App.
State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Walker, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/12/01)
State v. Jones 942 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Williams 930 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
1st Cir.1981), writ denied
State v. Brooks 914 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Kemp 896 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Walker 799 So. 2d 461 La. 2001
State v. Hill 601 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
For the purposes of Article 770, a police officer is not a “court official.” (La.App.
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Griffin 563 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Lambert 550 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Cir.1983); the potential for defendant’s rehabilitation, and the danger posed by the defendant to the public safety
Transworld Drilling Co. v. Texas General Resources, Inc. 516 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
denied, Eximco, Inc. v. Trane Co., 737 F.2d 505, 511 (5th Cir.1984) ].” Robertson, Recovery in Louisiana Tort Law For Intangible Economic Loss: Negligence Actions and the Tort of Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations, 46 La.L.Rev.
State v. Counterman 515 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Lucky v. Fricks 511 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1981), writ den., (La.
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Parker 503 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1983); the potential for defendant's rehabilitation, and the danger posed by the defendant to the public safety
State v. Johnson 497 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Koelemay 497 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Johnson 495 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Farris 491 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. McGuffey 486 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Frelix 484 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Camps 476 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
WHC, INC. v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc. 468 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1981); writ denied
State v. Cureaux 467 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Pupo 466 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Cann 460 So. 2d 1096 La. 1984
State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Berthelot 449 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Sanborn v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. 448 So. 2d 91 La. 1984
and Desormeaux v. Central Industries Company, Inc.
State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984
State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
State v. Wade 442 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Germain 433 So. 2d 110 La. 1983
State v. Young 432 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
D'Antoni v. D'Antoni 432 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
[1] Plaintiffs refer us to Justice Lemmon's comment in his dissent to the denial of the writ application in the Moss case, , as authority for us to recognize their cause of action, but we do not regard that comment as authority to disregard the definitive rulings of the court on the subject such as Templeton v. Interstate Electric Co., 214 La.
State v. Harper 430 So. 2d 627 La. 1983
State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
However, under Louisiana jurisprudence a police officer is not considered a "court official", and therefore La.C.Cr.P.