Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tasker, 450 So. 2d 644.

114 citing documents.

Keith Ezidore Versus Timothy Hooper, Warden La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Tracey T. Wright La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Deon Ray Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
we held that “[i]t is not essential that the act of the defendant should have been the sole cause of the death; if it hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the death, in a degree 17 sufficient to be
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Rosario-Colon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Lutz 235 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Kyles 233 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Willie James Robertson 172 So. 3d 616 La. 2015
‘[i]t is not essential that the act of the defendant should have been the sole cause of the death; if it hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the *619 death, in a degree sufficient to be a clearly contributing cause, that is sufficient.’ ” (quoting State v. Wilson, 114 La.
State v. Barnes 126 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 157 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Carlos Rios Cortes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1 Cir.), writ denied, )(citations omitted).
State v. Cortes 84 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 Cir.), writ denied, ) (citations omitted).
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
State v. Hopkins, 39,258, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“A jury may convict upon an accomplice’s uncorroborated testimony.” (La.App.
State v. Stewart 15 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
"A jury may convict upon an accomplice’s uncorroborated testimony.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brian A. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
In a case involving charges of negligent homicide arising from a “drag racing” accident, the supreme court found the proper test is whether the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the ensuing death.”
State v. Verret 9 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In a *1115 case involving charges of negligent homicide arising from a “drag racing” accident, the supreme court found the proper test is whether the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the ensuing death.”
State v. Bellow 993 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Kearney Alsandor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. ALSANDOR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
the supreme court held that it is not essential for the state to prove that the defendant's action was the sole cause of death; it is sufficient if her conduct hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the death, in a degree sufficient to be clearly a contributing cause.
State v. Gourdine 946 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
2d Cir.10/28/98), -773 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/23/99), , that the defendant's intoxicated driving need not be the only cause contributing to the death of the victim: the Louisiana Supreme Court held that it is not essential that the state prove that the defendant's action was the sole cause of death; it is sufficient if the defendant's conduct hastened the termination of life, or contributed, mediately or immediately, to the death, in a degree sufficient to be a clearly
State v. Wilhite 917 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Hopkins, 39,258 (La.
State v. Callier 909 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Hopkins 897 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Jetton, 32,893 (La.App.2d Cir.04/05/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.03/16/01), .
State v. Hart 881 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Wilson, 114 La.
State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Zornes 774 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Stone 758 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Dotson 747 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Obney 746 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2724 (La.2/9/95); , and State v. Wilson, 114 La.
State v. Richardson 729 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Montgomery 734 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Baker 720 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. President 715 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
App. 1 Cir.), writ denied
State v. Shanks 715 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Parfait 693 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied
State v. Franklin 693 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied, citing Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1983).
State v. Smith 672 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Clay 670 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
App. 1 Cir.), writ denied, citing Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1983), cert.
State v. Forrest 670 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Zeno, 610 So.2d *1272 at 270; (La.App.
State v. Alberto 665 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Zeno, 610 So.2d at 270 ; (La.App.
State v. Harris 657 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Martin, supra ; (La.
State v. Dugas 649 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Walker 650 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
It is not the function of appellate courts to reassess credibility of witnesses, and other cases.
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, (citing Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1983)).
State v. Gordon 646 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994