Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Alexandria v. Swafford, 491 So. 2d 1337.

149 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Climes Thibeaux AKA Nathaniel Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Thibeaux 229 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Campos 224 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), (La.
State v. Joseph 223 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), (La.
State v. Vallo 212 So. 3d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Under the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington, supra, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Louisiana v. Cody Keith Fontenot -Aka- Cody Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Fontenot 207 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
32 Under the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland v. Washington, (La.
State v. Cambrice 202 So. 3d 482 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), (La.
State ex rel. Sparkman v. State 202 So. 3d 488 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a conviction must be reversed if the petitioner proves (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms, and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict suspect
State ex rel. Massey v. State 201 So. 3d 243 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a conviction must be reversed if the defendant proves (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms, and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that die trial was rendered unfair and the verdict suspect.
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
2052, 2064, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), -39 (La.
State v. Joshua 201 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are governed by the standard set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington, supra, and adopted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v, Washington
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS READO NARGO A/K/A RENALDO NARGO La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); (La.
State v. Nargo 193 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State ex rel. Preston v. State 193 So. 3d 128 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), and State v. Washington,, a conviction must be reversed if the petitioner proves (1) that counsel's peiformanoe.fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms, and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict-suspect
State ex rel. Harris v. State 193 So. 3d 133 La. 2016
The court fmds.toese claims proceclurally barred tom review in post-conviction relief, , Claims #3..6..and 7 It is clear that the petitioner has a Sixth Amendment right to effective legal counsel, Under the well-known standard aet out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U,S. 668, 104 S.Ct 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a conviction must be reversed if the defendant proves (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms, and (2) co
State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), Blank fañs to show he was prejudiced by the omission of evidence of his troubled background in a case in which jurors heard his detailed confession to the murders of Ms. Philippe, Mr. Rossi, Mrs. Brock, Mr. and Mrs. Acuri, and Mrs. Bourgeois, and the attempted murders of Mr. and Mrs. Millet.
State ex rel. Williams v. State 195 So. 3d 433 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a conviction must be reversed if the defendant proves (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms, and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced *435 defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict sus
State ex rel. Arnaud v. State 188 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a conviotion must be reversed if Ae defendant proves (1) Aat counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional-norms, and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to Ae extent Aat the (rial was rendered unfair and Ae verdict suspect.
State v. Washington 175 So. 3d 958 La. 2015
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); (reviewing court must reverse conviction if petitioner shows that counsel’s performance fell below objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms and that counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced the petitioner).
State v. Crawford 176 So. 3d 394 La. 2015
State v. Turner, 2013-0285 (La.App.
State v. Lee 181 So. 3d 631 La. 2015
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court .must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes (1) counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate ^performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair an
State ex rel. Polizzi v. State 175 So. 3d 405 La. 2015
State v. Jenkins 172 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1441 , 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970)); -39 (La.1986) (incor *34 porating the Strickland , analysis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under La.
State ex rel. Wearry v. Cain 161 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair
State ex rel. Nalls v. State 152 So. 3d 164 La. 2014
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Louisiana v. Mauricio Garcia Cumbrera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Cumbrera 149 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Clark 149 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d5 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfai
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court, -39 (La.1986), adopted the framework for ineffective assistance claims as set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Louisiana v. Derrick L. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Turner 131 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
see also State v. West, 2009-2810, p. 1 (La.12/10/10), .
State v. Thomas 124 So. 3d 1049 La. 2013
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are generally governed by the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington, and adopted by this Court in State v. Washington, 85-2339 (La.7/18/86), .
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent t
State of Louisiana v. Donald Runnels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
In assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, the defendant must show that: (1) “counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness” and (2) “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
State v. Runnels 101 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, the defendant must show that: (1) “counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness” and (2) “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State ex rel. Benn v. State 90 So. 3d 1045 La. 2012
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Louisiana v. Martin P. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); -39 (La.1986).
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfai
State v. Thomas 81 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-39 (La.1986), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the two-part Strickland test applied to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
State v. Washington 72 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Louisiana v. Jason Allen Lomax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional 11 norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performan
State v. Ford 57 So. 3d 297 La. 2011
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes that (1) counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair
State v. West 50 So. 3d 148 La. 2010
366, 370 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985)
State v. Bass 47 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)