DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Alexandria v. Swafford, 491 So. 2d 1337.

149 citing documents.

  • State v. Howard 37 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Kivin Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward L. Christien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); -39 (La.1986).
  • State v. Christien 29 So. 3d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); -39 (La.1986).
  • State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the exten
  • State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfai
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph L. Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Roberts 4 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent tha
  • State of Louisiana v. David Stapleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair
  • State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair
  • State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict suspect, i.e.
  • State v. Stapleton 997 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict suspect, i.e.
  • State ex rel. Lee. v. State 993 So. 2d 1209 La. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Damon Lee Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Cotrell Robinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent tha
  • State v. Robinson 981 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfai
  • State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Matthis 970 So. 2d 505 La. 2007
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), requires respondent to show not only that his trial attorney's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms but also that counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced him to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the verdict suspect, i.e.
  • State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Brian Maness La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent tha
  • State of Louisiana v. Dennis Wayne Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent tha
  • State v. Baker 956 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfai
  • State of Louisiana v. George Commeta Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel’s inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent tha
  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl A. Holmes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathan Stringer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Stringer 949 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes: (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard *143 of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered
  • State v. Morris 882 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms, and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and t
  • State v. Forrest 876 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); see also, -39 (La.1986).
  • State v. Lentz 844 So. 2d 837 La. 2003
    [2] Under the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland and adopted by this court in State v. Washington a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms and counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair and the
  • State v. Guilbeau 838 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Johnson 822 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Montalban 810 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
    366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); -39 (La.1986).
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
    -168 (La.1988); , 1339 (La.1986).
  • State ex rel. Washington v. State 802 So. 2d 638 La. 2001
    366, 370 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985)
  • State v. Holley 799 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    838 , 122 L.Ed.2d 180 (1993), which standard was adopted [18] by this Court in State v. Washington, *576 a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes (1) that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) counsel's inadequate performance prejudiced defendant to the extent that the trial was rendered unfair
  • State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    quoting Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 , 106 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cook 742 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State ex rel. Scales v. State 718 So. 2d 402 La. 1998
    838 , 122 L.Ed.2d 180 (1993), , 1339 (La.1986).
  • State v. Hongo 706 So. 2d 419 La. 1997
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Sheppard 679 So. 2d 899 La. 1996
    366, 370 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); -39 (La.1986).
  • State ex rel. Clement v. Whitley 678 So. 2d 538 La. 1996
    366, 370 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); namely, whether “there [was] a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, [relator] would not have *539 pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill 474 U.S. at 59 , 106 S.Ct.
  • State v. Scott 651 So. 2d 1344 La. 1995
    366, 370 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); namely, whether "there [was] a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, [relator] would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial."
  • State v. Sheppard 646 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the two-part test of Strickland v. Washington, supra, applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Sheppard 618 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Darville 573 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991