Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Hill, 608 So. 2d 627.

38 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jarrod Perkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Derrick T. Hills La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Defendant acknowledges, however, that when such evidence tends to prove a material issue and has independent relevance other than showing the defendant is of bad character, it may be admitted pursuant to certain statutory and jurisprudential limitations.
State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cooks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Robertson 243 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Silguero , (La.
State v. Bailey 115 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 491 [490] (1994)
State v. Leday 97 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Winn 978 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Aleman, 01-743, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Fortino 837 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Aleman 809 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Hopson, 98-943, pp. 12-13 (La.App.
State v. Charles 790 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.5/19/99), ; writ denied, 99-1785 (La.11/24/99), ; State v. Sterling, 95-673 (La.App.
State v. Barling 779 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Maise 759 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
First, one of the above-enumerated factors must be at issue, have some independent relevance or be an element of the crime charged in order for the evidence to be admissible.
State v. Hernandez 735 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Battie 735 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
[4] State v. Sterling, 95-673 (La.App.
State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Evans, supra ; on remand, (La.App.
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Pardon, supra at 56 .
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Pardon, supra at 56 .
State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Willis 721 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-30 (La.1992); the court explained that: _JgOne statutory exception to the general rule of exclusion is other crimes evidence used to prove knowledge when proof of such is required to establish guilt.
State v. Evans 712 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Clark 687 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
We further note that the State asserted in its brief that no Prieur notice was given in the present case, appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 491 (1994)
State v. Williams 672 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 94 La. 1995
1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 491 (1994)
State v. Ham 652 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
art. 403 [footnote omitted]
Angeron v. Martin 649 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Mitchell 649 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Jackson 625 So. 2d 146 La. 1993
State v. Silguero 616 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Simon 617 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993