Griffen v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Griffen v. Department of Health & Human Resources, 599 So. 2d 294 (La. 1992).
Cited by
Distinguished in 1
- James B. Cantrelle, in his official capacity as the President of the Parish of … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
- Eric R. Ehlenberger, M.D. Versus Guardian Medical Group, LLC & Sidney Abusch, C.P.A. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- Citizens Savings Bank v. G & C Development, L.L.C. 113 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Code v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 103 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Baker v. MOREHOUSE PARISH SCHOOL BD. 956 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- Chauvin v. Wellcheck, Inc. 938 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- James v. Ocean National, L.L.C. 905 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
- Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
- Edgar Benjamin Fontaine Testamentary Trust v. Jackson Brewery Marketplace 847 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Miller v. SEVEN C'S PROPERTIES, LLC 800 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Hodgins v. Hodgins 726 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Relator’s original and supplemental notices of appeal contained the place and the period of time (including some dates) the discriminatory action took place, the name of the person alleged to have taken the discriminatory action, the names of other persons treated differently during a specific time period, and a sufficiently detailed description of the events and pattern of conduct (including some dates) leading to the alleged adverse decision based on race. These notices adequately comply with Civil Service Rule 13.11(d). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal affirming the dismissal of relator’s appeal is reversed, and relator’s appeal is reinstated. The case is remanded to the Civil Service Commission Appeals Referee for further proceedings.