Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. B.J., 617 So. 2d 238.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Authur Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State in Interest of B.J., (La.
State ex rel. T.W. 175 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State in the Interest of B.J., , 241.
State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
order to adjudicate a juvenile delinquent of possession of stolen property, “the state must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that 1) the property was stolen, and 2) the property was of value, and 3) that the defendant knew or should have known that the property was stolen, and 4) that the defendant intentionally possessed, procured, received or concealed the property.” State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
order to adjudicate a juvenile delinquent of possession of stolen property, “the state must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that 1) the property was stolen, and 2) the property was of value, and 3) that the defendant knew or should have known that the property was stolen, and 4) that the defendant intentionally possessed, procured, received or concealed the property.” State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State v. Phillips 905 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State ex rel. S.D. 807 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State in Interest of B.J., , 243 (La.App.
Criticized State v. Dawson 752 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Additionally, we decline to follow the Third Circuit’s holding in State in Interest of B.J., , since the State herein did not present any credible, admissible evidence to support its estimation of the vehicle’s value.
State v. R.W. 721 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Cummings, 95-1377 (La.2/28/96), ; State in Interest of B.J., , 241 (La.App.
State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State in the Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State ex rel. D.S. 673 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 7/26/94), ; State in Interest of BJ., (La.App.
State ex rel. R.W.L. 671 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir.1993); State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State in Interest of AH 670 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State in Interest of CD 658 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.
State v. Corvers 646 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
See also, State in the Interest of B.J., , 241 (La.App.
State in Interest of REB 643 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State in the Interest of B.J., (La.
State in Interest of JG 641 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
ERROR PATENT REVIEW This Court, in State in Interest of B.J., (La.App.