DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stockle v. Zimmer, USA, 619 So. 2d 1059.

583 citing documents.

  • State v. McCauley 122 So. 3d 596 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Boyd,, 46,321 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/11), .
  • State v. Johnson 121 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    P. art. 881.1 merely alleges that his sentence is excessive, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” This bare claim preserves only a claim of constitutional excessiveness.
  • State v. Smith 117 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Boyd, 46,321 (La.
  • State v. Holmes 110 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Mastin, 46,958 (La.App.2d Cir.1/25/12), .
  • State v. Henderson 110 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    However, when the defendant’s motion to reconsider urges merely that the sentence is excessive, he is then “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” State v. Mims, 93-0808 (La.6/18/93), ; State v. Engle, 43,812 (La.App.
  • State v. Duncan 109 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 45,755 (La.App.
  • State v. Dennis 109 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir.12/17/03), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), ; State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/06), .
  • State v. Stewart 109 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir.12/17/03), .
  • State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 45,755 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Philip A. Geraci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Preston 103 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Boyd, 46,321 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/11), .
  • State v. Taylor 103 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 103 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Nelams, 45,817 (La.App.2d Cir.11/3/10), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Lambert 93 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Blanche 92 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Blanche 91 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Since defendant’s motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” This bare claim preserves only a claim of constitutional excessiveness, Mims, supra; State v. Lofton, 41,423 (La.App.
  • State v. Colvin 85 So. 3d 663 La. 2012
  • State v. Jefferson 91 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/06), .
  • State v. Jackson 87 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.
  • State v. Foster 87 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Since Defendant’s motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” This bare claim preserves only a claim of constitutional excessiveness, Mims, supra; State v. Lofton, 41,423 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/06), , writ denied, 06-2952 (La.9/28/07), .
  • State v. Mastin 86 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    (1993); State v. Williams, 45,755 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 90 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/17/03), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Robinson 87 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
  • State v. Mosley 80 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Richie, 44,783 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/09), , writ denied, 2009-2492 (La.4/30/10), .
  • State v. Hernandez-Zuniga 81 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Decay, 01-192 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 80 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    P. art. 881.1 E; State v. Mims, 93-0808 (La.6/18/93), ; State v. Montgomery, 42,432 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), .
  • State of Louisiana v. George Roy Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Young 73 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Boyd 72 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d *955 Cir.12/17/08), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Wallace 71 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/06), .
  • State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Richie, 44,783 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/09), , writ denied, 2009-2492 (La.4/30/10), .
  • State v. Shoupe 71 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 45,755 (La.App.2d Cir.l 1/3/10), .
  • State v. Enterkin 71 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Mims, 93-0808 (La.6/18/93), ; State v. Jenkins, 45,873 (LaApp.
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Barnett 70 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Richie, 44,783 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/09), 25 So.Sd 879, writ denied, 2009-2492 (La.4/30/10), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    -60 (La.1993), the supreme court addressed this requirement, explaining: Under Article 881.1 Defendant must file a motion to reconsider and set forth the “specific grounds” upon which the motion is based in order to raise an objection to the sentence on appeal.
  • State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    -60 (La.1993), the supreme court addressed this requirement, explaining: Under Article 881.1 Defendant must file a motion to reconsider and set forth the “specific grounds” upon which the motion is based in order to raise an objection to the sentence on appeal.
  • State v. Henderson 58 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/06), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Turner 57 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Richie, 44,783 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/09), , writ denied, 09-2492 (La.4/30/10), .
  • State v. Jenkins 57 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Willis, 31,561 (La.App.2d Cir.1/20/99), ; State v. Anderson, 30,060 (La.App.2d Cir.10/29/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    When a defendant’s motion for reconsideration alleges generally that the sentence is excessive, writ denied, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” This bare claim preserves only a claim of constitutional excessiveness.
  • State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. NELAMS 55 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir.12/17/03), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010