DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stockle v. Zimmer, USA, 619 So. 2d 1059.

583 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin T. Arndt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Franco, 08-1071 (La.App.
  • State v. Garner 47 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Kelly 46 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir.12/17/03), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Edwards 42 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Since the defendant’s motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” This bare claim preserves only a claim of constitutional excessiveness.
  • State v. Lewis 36 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Here, since Lewis’ motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, she is “simply relegated to having the appellate court | ..¡consider the bare claim of excessiveness.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Franco, 08-1071 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward N. Wide La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    See also, State v. West, 01-969 (La.App.
  • State v. WIDE 35 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See also, State v. West, 01-969 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. David Paul Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Guidry 30 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Smith 34 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Cooper 32 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    More specifically, he asserts that as a second felony offender, with a prior conviction for possession of cocaine, he should not have received a sentence “anywhere near the maximum sentence which the trial court could have imposed.” *354 Since Cooper’s motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” Constitutional review turns upon whether the sentence is illegal, grossly di
  • State v. Collins 35 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. McKEAVER 32 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir.12/17/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph T. Plauche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Franco, 08-1071 (La.App.
  • State v. Plauche 32 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Franco, 08-1071 (La.App.
  • State v. Evans 30 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lofton 25 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Tory Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Landry 21 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    art. 881.1; State v. Speed, 43,786 (La.App.
  • State v. Richie 25 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.2d Cir.12/17/03), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Marshall 26 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.
  • State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.
  • State v. Morgan 16 So. 3d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Hayes 16 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Raymundo Franco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    -60 (La.1993), the supreme court addressed this requirement, explaining: If the defendant does not allege any specific ground for excessiveness or present any argument or evidence not previously considered by the court at original sentencing, then the defendant does not lose the right to
  • State v. Franco 8 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    -60 (La.1993), the supreme court addressed this requirement, explaining: If the defendant does not allege any specific ground for excessiveness or present any argument or evidence not previously considered by the court at original sentencing, then the defendant does not lose the right to appeal the sentence; the
  • State v. Howard 4 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Since defendant’s motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, (La.
  • State v. Brown 4 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.2d 09/20/06), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.02/25/98), .
  • State v. Dotie 1 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Because Dotie’s motion to reconsider urged merely that the sentence was excessive, he is now “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” State v. Lofton, 41,-423 (La.App.
  • State v. Speed 2 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    art. 881.1; State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.
  • State v. Engle 2 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    | ¡¡Because Engle’s motion to reconsider urged merely that the sentence was excessive, he is now “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” State v. Lofton, 41,-423 (La.App.
  • State v. Bass 4 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.
  • State v. Ridgley 7 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See also: ("Article 881.1 only precludes the defendant from presenting arguments to the court of appeal which were not presented to the trial court at a point in the proceedings when the trial court was in a position to correct the deficiency.”).
  • State v. Bedoya 998 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Mims, 93-808 (La.6/18/93), -60 (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. E. J. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. EJF 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Rogers 999 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    The defendant's motion for reconsideration of sentence merely alleged that the sentence is excessive
  • State v. SHYNE 999 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Therefore, he is "simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness."
  • State of Louisiana v. S.L. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Lakieth Milligan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    ” State v. Theriot, 04-897, p. 8 (La.App.
  • State v. S.L.D. 997 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Milligan 996 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. SLD 997 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Masters, 37,967 (La.App.
  • State v. Sterling 996 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Since defendant's motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, he is relegated to our sole consideration of the bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State v. Mingo 997 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008