State v. Moore
State v. Moore, 617 So. 2d 483 (La. 1993).
Cited by
- Concursus Proceeding in Breach of Contract & Inequitable Attorneys Fee-Split Levert v. Martinez 939 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Slaughter v. ARCO Chemical Company 931 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Commercial Union v. CBC TEMPORARY STAFFING 897 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Todd S. Darbonne v. Allied Signal, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Darbonne v. Allied Signal, Inc. 865 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Hebert v. ANCO Insulation, Inc. 835 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Durio v. Robert E. Lee, Inc. 774 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- Triche v. Crescent Turnkey & Engineering, LLC 744 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
- Phillips v. Patterson Insurance Co. 704 So. 2d 246 La. 1998
- Kidder v. SAVOY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. 673 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Landry v. Gibbens 665 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Cheramie v. Acadian Ambulance Serv., Inc. 671 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The supplemental report sought by relators is clearly a followup or subsequent report and not an initial report, as the initial report produced by the state includes all information obtained in the initial investigation of the complaint. Under La.R.S. 44:3(4)(a), a followup or subsequent report is not a public record. Accordingly, the court was correct in vacating the order of the trial court directing the prosecutor to furnish the supplemental police report to relators. However, relators are entitled to be informed of “the substance of any oral statement which the state intends to offer in evidence made by the defendant, whether before or after arrest, in response to interrogation by any person then known to the defendant to be a law enforcement officer.” La.Code Crim.P. art. 716. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court to conduct an in camera inspection of the supplemental report, determine if it contains any statements falling under La. Code Crim.P. art. 716 and disclose the substance of these statements to relators. WATSON, J., not on panel.