DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Moore, 617 So. 2d 483.

14 citing documents.

  • Concursus Proceeding in Breach of Contract & Inequitable Attorneys Fee-Split Levert v. Martinez 939 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    See Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., 93-0541 (La.4/30/93), .
  • Slaughter v. ARCO Chemical Company 931 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    art. 928 which held that filing a declinatory exception of improper venue in the same pleading with the answer does not under La.
  • Commercial Union v. CBC TEMPORARY STAFFING 897 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., (holding that the defendant's filing of interrogatories and requests for production of documents after filing an exception of improper venue did not waive the pending venue exception); Hebert v. ANCO Insulation, Inc. 00-1929, p. 7 (La.App.
  • Todd S. Darbonne v. Allied Signal, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    10 Bickham v. Sub Sea Int’l Inc.
  • Darbonne v. Allied Signal, Inc. 865 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Bickham v. Sub Sea Int’l Inc.
  • Hebert v. ANCO Insulation, Inc. 835 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc.
  • Durio v. Robert E. Lee, Inc. 774 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the defendant did not waive the pending declinatory exception of improper venue by filing interrogatories and requests for production of documents, together with its answer, while the exception was pending.
  • Triche v. Crescent Turnkey & Engineering, LLC 744 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    art. 928 sets forth the time periods for the pleading of exceptions and provides, in pertinent part that, “[t]he dec-linatory exception and the dilatory exception shall be pleaded prior to or in the answer, or prior to the confirmation of a default judgment.” In Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the defendant did not waive the pending declinatory exception of improper venue by filing interrogatories and requests for production of ^documents while the e
  • Phillips v. Patterson Insurance Co. 704 So. 2d 246 La. 1998
  • Kidder v. SAVOY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. 673 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    See Bickham v. Sub Sea Intern., Inc.
  • Landry v. Gibbens 665 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Cheramie v. Acadian Ambulance Serv., Inc. 671 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    As set forth in Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc., the filing of interrogatories and requests for production of documents constitutes a general appearance which would waive any objections raised by declinatory exceptions.
  • Delay v. Charbonnet 627 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc.
  • Bickham v. Sub Sea International, Inc. 618 So. 2d 415 La. 1993
    In re Bickham, Walter; — Plaintiff(s); applying for rehearing of this Court’s Action dated April 30, 1993, ; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, No. 92-9966, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92CW-2202.