Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Harris, 638 So. 2d 645.

23 citing documents.

Wendell G. Russ v. City of New Orleans, New Orleans Police Department, and Lieutenant Aldrich in Her Capacity … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Leblanc v. Thibodeaux 256 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/5/94), , explained the applicability of La.Civ.Code art. 3494 to specific claims enumerated therein, rather than La.Civ.Code art. 3499, which is the general statute applying only to personal claims not otherwise provided for in other legislation.
Randy Leblanc v. Fred Alan Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
7/5/94), explained the applicability of La.Civ.Code art. 3494 to specific claims enumerated therein, rather than La.Civ.Code art. 3499, which is the general statute applying only to personal claims not otherwise provided for in other legislation.
Coleman v. Querbes Co. No. 1 218 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
7/5/94), , and refused to treat a claim for compensation for services rendered as a contract claim in Fishbein v. State, supra.
Bezou v. Bezou 203 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Minor v. Monroe Surgical Hospital, LLC 154 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
3494 and 3499 was discussed at length by the supreme court in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 1993-2715 (La.7/5/94), , where the plaintiffs filed suit alleging that the defendant school board breached their employment contracts by paying them less than they should have received under a salary index.
Monroe v. Physicians Behavioral Hospital, LLC 147 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Bd., 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), , stated: Plaintiffs, and the court of appeal, would have us believe that article 3494’s three year prescriptive period for past wages is not applicable here because their action for breach of contract is distinguishable from a claim for past due wages.
Brumberger v. Cvitanovich 140 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
*120 In Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94); , certain employees, who worked under four-year employment contracts with the Board, filed suit alleging that the Board had breached their respective contracts by underpaying them.
Jack L. Duty v. Louisiana Firefighters' Retirement System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
7/5/94), (footnote omitted).
City of Breaux Bridge v. Charles Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
7/5/94), : (emphasis in original) This petition to recover underpaid „compensation for services rendered‟ is admittedly a personal action as defined by Louisiana Civil Code of Procedure article 422.
Touro Infirmary v. American Maritime Officer 34 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
* * * Tulane contends that the reasoning in Grabert [v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), ] is dispositive of the issue before us of whether the applicable prescriptive period in this case is La.
Dill v. 32nd Judicial District Court Judicial Clerk's Fund 27 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
The supreme court in Fishbein relied upon Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), , in which employees with a four-year employment contract sued for breach of contract and past due wages.
Assaleh v. Sherwood Forest Country Club Inc. 991 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
We are guided by the Louisiana Supreme Court opinion in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .
Murray v. CITY OF HARAHAN 954 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
The Fishbein court relied on Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .
Wayne Watkins v. St. Martin Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
7/5/94), wherein the supreme court recognized that an action for salary or wages past due under the appropriate salary index is subject to the three-year limitation period of La.Civ.Code art. 3494.
Watkins v. ST. MARTIN PARISH SCHOOL BD. 929 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See also Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), , wherein the supreme court recognized that an action for salary or wages past due under the appropriate salary index is subject to the three-year limitation period of La.Civ.Code art. 3494.
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
We dealt with this precise issue in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
We dealt with this precise issue in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .
Qayyum v. MOREHOUSE GENERAL HOSP. 874 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Morehouse cites Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-C-2715 (La.7/5/94), , in support of its argument that Dr. Qayyum is seeking remuneration for his services as an employee of Morehouse.
Distinguished Parry v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 828 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Citing Stams, supra, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), found unpersuasive the argument that an “action for breach of contract is distinguishable from a claim for past due wages,” reasoning: The answer appears to be simple enough.
Smith v. Dishman & Bennett Speciality Co., Inc. 805 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Bd., 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .
Buras v. Schultz 789 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
e “[a]n action for the recovery of compensation for services rendered, including payment of salaries, wages, commissions, tuition fees, professional fees, fees and emoluments of public officials, freight, passage, money, lodging, and board.” Mr. Buras’ argument that the ten-year period for suit on a contract is applicable was rejected in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .
Buras v. Schultz 752 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Mr. Buras' argument that the ten-year period for suit on a contract is applicable was rejected in Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board, 93-2715 (La.7/5/94), .