Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nicholes v. Motors Insurance Corp., 680 So. 2d 1165.

422 citing documents.

  • State v. Patterson 83 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Barton 80 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.02/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Shawn Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Shelton 75 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), , (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Lester Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048, p. 1 (La.10/4/96)
  • State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Cambrice 64 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 1/14/09), (citing State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Palmer 57 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 57 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Greene 55 So. 3d 775 La. 2011
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048, p. 1 (La.10/4/96)
  • State v. Malone 56 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. Enterkin 56 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward D. Gresham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96)
  • State v. Burns 48 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Cooper 42 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. R. R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. RR 37 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d *506 517, 521; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. R.R. 37 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d *506 517, 521 ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Logan 34 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), 922 So.2d *535 517; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Gipson 34 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Rob *1096 ertson, 1996-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Sumrall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Gene Hollier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96)
  • State v. Sumrall 34 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Hollier 37 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State v. Burns 32 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Williams 32 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Sumlin 25 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Holder 25 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Richie 25 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Redfearn 22 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Culp 17 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Triggs 16 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Yates 15 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Sims 11 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Davis 15 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Olden 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    10/4/96), , 1166 (per curiam).
  • State v. Collins 12 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Pugh 12 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State ex rel. B.A.A. 13 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State Ex Rel. Baa 13 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. McKinney 12 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Simpkins 12 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Black 12 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Jones 8 So. 3d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .