Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 660 So. 2d 7.
- Daphne Reissland v. Valluzzo Companies, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
-
Johnny Cousain v. Smitty&39;s Supply, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
9/ 5/ 95), the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated that La.
- Neil Laugand v. Four Points by Sheraton La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
- Cembell Industries, Inc. & the Gray Insurance Company v. Kevin Smith La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
-
Zatarains & Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. Versus Danelle Rodney
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
09/05/95), Rodriguez v. Nola Motor Club, L.L.C., 19-447 (La.
-
Paul Medley v. Bennett Timber Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
9/5/95), the supreme court analyzed the “clear and unambiguous” language of La.R.S.
- Thomas Southern v. Servpro D E Investments and LWCC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
-
Donald Jenson v. Berry Global Group, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
9/5/95), Griffith v. CMR Constr.
-
Leroy Johnson v. Lofton Staffing Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ), this court stated, “The only requirements for forfeiture of benefits under Section 1208 are (1) a false statement or representation (2) that is willfully made (3) for the purpose of obtaining or 5 defeating any benefit or payment under the workers’ compensation law.
-
Ronnie Griffith v. CMR Construction & Maintenance Resources and LCTA Workers' Compensation
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
9/5/95), Beck, supra; Freeman v. Chase, 42,716 (La.
- Ramon Rodriguez Versus Nola Motor Club, L.L.C. and New York Marine & General Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
-
Debra White v. Wis International
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
9/5/95), -14, the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed claims under La.R.S.
- Leontine Moran Versus Rouse's Enterprises, LLC and Great American Alliance Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
-
Donald Tanks v. Cb&i, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Id., citing Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95)
-
Malvilen Cook v. St. Genevive Health Care Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Co., 94-2708, (La.9/5/95), ).
-
Ralph Weaver v. Chicago Bridge & Iron
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Id., citing 9 Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94–2708, 94–3138 (La.9/5/95)
-
Hunter v. Town of Richwood
273 So. 3d 560
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
9/5/95), ; Louisiana Workers' Comp.
- Lovas v. Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc. 267 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Shelton v. Smitty's Supply, Inc. 253 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Betty Reeder v. Hardtner Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Reeder v. Hardtner Med. Ctr. 244 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Katina Hodges v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Hodges v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC 242 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Lori Hataway v. Akal Security, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
9/5/95), our supreme court outlined the proof required to prove fraud under La.R.S.
-
Hataway v. AKAL Security, Inc.
235 So. 3d 1189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
9/5/95), , 16, our supreme court outlined the proof required to prové fraud under La.R.S.
- Luba Workers' Compensation v. Albert Dennis Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
-
Ehrman v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
221 So. 3d 945
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
9/5/95), ; Franklin v. Health-South, 41,458 (La.App.
-
Charlie Johnson v. A. W. Chesterton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
9/5/95), addressed the proof required to prove fraud under La.R.S.
-
Johnson v. Chesterton
210 So. 3d 821
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
9/5/95), , addressed the proof required to prove fraud under La.
- Guichard Operating Co. v. Porche 212 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Marion E. Bartley v. Garden View Assisted Living
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
9/5/95), addressed the proof required under La.R.S.
-
Earnest Hypolite v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
9/5/95), addressed the proof required to prove fraud under La.R.S.
-
Hypolite v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp.
206 So. 3d 255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
9/5/95), , addressed the proof required to prove fraud under La.R.S.
-
Mary Heathcoate (Obo) Christopher Farmer-Deceased v. D & D Drilling & Exploration, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
9/5/95), ” Edwards v. Se.
-
Heathcoate ex rel. Farmer v. D & D Drilling & Exploration, Inc.
200 So. 3d 371
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
9/5/95), .” Edwards v. Se.
- Maria Ebarb v. Boise Cascade Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Margaret Gaines v. Pinecrest Supports & Services Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
-
The Wood Group Psn, Inc. v. Todd Romero
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
9/5/95), addressed the proof required to prove fraud under La.R.S.
-
Wood Group PSN, Inc. v. Romero
215 So. 3d 862
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 94-2708, p. 14 (La.9/5/95), , addressed the proof required to prove fraud under La.
-
Dow v. Chalmette Restaurant, Ltd.
193 So. 3d 1222
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 94-2708, pp. 1-2 (La.9/5/95); .
- Karen Weems v. Electric Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
-
Weems v. Electric Ins. Co.
193 So. 3d 1214
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Baker v. Harrah's
190 So. 3d 379
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Green v. Allied Building Stores, Inc.
185 So. 3d 164
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708, (La.09/05/95), -16 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Storks admits that, as written, [La.
-
Ellis Hargrave v. Elier Diaz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95)
-
Hargrave v. Diaz
178 So. 3d 587
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
- Thomas Gibson v. Resin Systems, Inc. and Luba La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
Gibson v. Resin Systems, Inc.
175 So. 3d 1141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 94-2708, 94-3188 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Malone-Watson v. Strategic Restaurants
176 So. 3d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Billy Carrier v. Tiffany Harrington
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
9/5/95), set forth what a party bringing a claim under La.R.S.