Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 660 So. 2d 7.

391 citing documents.

Carrier v. Harrington 162 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana State Supreme Court in Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), , set forth what a party bringing a claim under La.R.S.
Roland Sorile v. Lott Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Sorile v. Lott Oil Co. 160 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
*185 Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), )).
Michelle Buchanan v. Luba Worker's Comp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Marlon Lavalais v. Gilchrist Construction Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
9/5/95), (footnotes omitted), the supreme court clarified the difference between La.R.S.
Mark Edwards v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Lavalais v. Gilchrist Construction Co. 158 So. 3d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
23:1208 and 1208.1, in Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 10 (La.9/5/95), (footnotes omitted), the supreme court clarified the difference between La.R.S.
Edwards v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. 158 So. 3d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
Buchanan v. LUBA Workers' Comp. 158 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
Lucy Johnson v. St. Francis Nursing & Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Johnson v. St. Frances Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 155 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
Sherry Debarge v. Lfi Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), the supreme court concluded that the legislatively imposed forfeiture under La.R.S.23:1208.1, applies only if the employer suffers prejudice.
DeBarge v. LFI of Lake Charles 154 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), , the supreme court concluded that the legislatively imposed forfeiture under La.R.S.23:1208.1, applies only if the employer suffers prejudice.
Kennen Daniel v. Point to Point Directional Drilling, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95)
Daniel v. Point to Point Directional Drilling, Inc. 139 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. James Constance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), Babineaux v. Moss Motors, 06-749 (La.App.
Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. Constance 137 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ; Babineaux v. Moss Motors, 06-749 (La.App.
Corey Lamartiniere v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), Babineaux v. Moss Motors, 06-749 (La.App.
Lamartiniere v. Boise Cascade Corp. 137 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ; Babineaux v. Moss Motors, 06-749 (La.App.
Brady Gotte v. Barnes Personnel Management, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Resweber v. Harroll Const., Co., 94-2078 (La.09/05/95)
Gotte v. Barnes Personnel Management, Inc. 133 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Resweber v. Haroil Const., Co., 94-2078 [94-2708] (La.09/05/95), .
Christy Rogel v. Dollar General Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Linda Anderson v. Kroger 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Herschel Carter v. Turner Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Rogel v. Dollar General Corp. 132 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
Carter v. Turner Industries 127 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
Anderson v. Kroger, 747 127 So. 3d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“The only requirements for forfeiture of benefits under Section 1208 are that (1) there is a false statement or representation, (2) it is willfully made, and (3) it is made for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment.” Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
Desadier v. West Frasier, Inc. 122 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2078 (La.09/05/95), .
Carolyn Davis v. Tri-Parish Rehabilitation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Davis v. Tri-Parish Rehabilitation 112 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
23:1208; Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
Martha Diana Rougeau v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
9/5/95), Babineaux v. Moss Motors, 06-749 (La.App.
Rougeou v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital 107 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ; Babineaux v. Moss Motors, 06-749 (La.App.
Gabriel v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 106 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; Porter v. Pellerin Construction Company, 06-949, p. 5 (La.App.
Jason D. Dugas v. Autozone, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Dugas v. AutoZone, Inc. 103 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 94-2708, (La.9/5/95), ).
Ronald Dunn, Jr. v. Lakewood Quarters Retirement Community La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
St. Landry Parish Government v. Anthony Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
9/5/95), ], the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the forfeiture of benefits due to Louisiana Revised Statute 23:1208 are first, there is a false statement or representation, second it is willfully made, and third, it is made for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment.
Dunn v. Lakewood Quarters Retirement Community 103 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Resweber v. Haroil Const Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
St. Landry Parish Government v. Rubin 105 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ], the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the forfeiture of benefits due to Louisiana Revised Statute 23:1208 are first, there is a false statement or representation, second it is willfully made, and third, it is made for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment.
George R. Harris v. Twin City Electric, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Id., citing Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95)
Harris v. Twin City Electric, LLC 92 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id, citing Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
Redmann v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance 88 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; Porter v. Pellerin Construction Company, 06-949 (La.App.
Richardson v. North Oaks Hospital 91 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
Stonetrust Commercial Insurance Co. v. George 81 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), ; Thomas v. Hollywood Casino, supra.
Beck v. Newt Brown Contractors, LLC 72 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; Thomas v. Hollywood, Casino, 44,271 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/09), ; Freeman v. Chase, 42 ,716 (La.App.2d Cir.12/5/07), .
David Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Dustin Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. 65 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 12/30/05), (citing Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ).
Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc. 54 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 94-3138, p. 11 (La.9/5/95), .
John Thibodeaux v. Mechanical Construction Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010