DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bivins, 696 So. 2d 551.

675 citing documents.

  • Scott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 873 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • City of Jennings v. Mary Lou Doucet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Terrell G. Istre v. International Maintenance Co., LLP La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    7/1/97), (citations omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court set forth the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases as follows: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Istre v. International Maintenance Co. 865 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court set forth the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases as follows: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • City of Jennings v. Doucet 865 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Roofing and Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 10-11 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Lyons v. Terrebonne Parish School Board 868 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Cade v. SAFETY COUNCIL OF LA. CAPITAL AREA 868 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Wilkerson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 864 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Williams v. Enmon Enterprises 864 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In so holding, the WCJ relied on Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Lee v. St. James Parish Council 864 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , *742 summarized the law in this area.
  • Mitchell v. Winnfield Holding Corp. 861 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Vocational Rehabilitation In order for an employer to satisfy its burden of proving job availability the Louisiana Supreme Court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , stated: [A]n employer may discharge its burden of proving job availability by establishing, at a minimum, the following, by competent evidence: (1) the existence of a suitable job within claimant's physical capabilities and within claimant's or the employer's community or reasonable ge
  • Michael W. Mitchell v. Winnfield Holding Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/1/97), stated: [A]n employer may discharge its burden of proving job availability by establishing, at a minimum, the following, by competent evidence: (1) the existence of a suitable job within claimant’s physical capabilities and within claimant’s or the employer’s community or reasona
  • Schindler v. ORLEANS REGIONAL SEC. 862 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Hollins v. People Works 861 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Cooper v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 862 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Killett v. Sanderson Farms, 01-0277 (La.App.
  • Wilbert Arnold v. Wal-Mart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Shannon Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/1/97), (citations omitted) (alteration in 4 original), the supreme court explained the manifest error standard of review as follows: In applying the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, the appellate court must determine not whether the trier of fact was right
  • Darrell Ranel v. McDonald's La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/1/97), -57(quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, p. 7 (La.
  • Arnold v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 858 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In general, an appellate court is to review rulings issued in workers' compensation matters according to the manifest error—clearly wrong standard, set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 858 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court explained the manifest error standard of review as follows: In applying the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, the appellate court must determine not whether the trier of fact was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder's conclusion was a reas
  • Ranel v. McDonald's 858 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 8-11 (La.7/1/97), -57 (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), ; ) (case citations omitted)(alteration in original).
  • Gajeske v. Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. 859 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Fite v. Louisiana Title Co. 859 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Seal, supra ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Crotwell, supra .
  • Vila Harris v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/1/97), the supreme court, without discussing the exact language of Section 1226(E), permitted a fifty percent reduction in benefits retroactively from the date the employee refused to cooperate with all rehabilitation.
  • Harris v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 857 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    However, in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , the supreme court, without discussing the exact language of Section 1226(E), permitted a fifty percent reduction in benefits retroactively from the date the employee refused to cooperate with all rehabilitation.
  • Richard Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/1/97), : 3 Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 856 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    LAW AND DISCUSSION Standard of Review The standard of review in a workers' compensation hearing was set out in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , 556: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Authement v. Wal-Mart 857 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Gray v. Crocker 855 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Ware v. Allen Parish School Bd. 854 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    23:1221(3)(c)(i); Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Seal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 857 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/01/97), .
  • Mitchell v. United Parcel Service 855 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Frazier v. Dollar General 852 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Johnson v. T & LNAS/Domino Sugar 854 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Daniels v. Keller Supply, Inc. 854 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Calk v. EPCO-Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. 854 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Mosley v. Pennzoil Quaker State 850 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dep't of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Alphonso v. Bridge Terminal Transport 852 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Ivy v. V's Holding Co. 859 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Kemp v. East Baton Rouge City Parish 858 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Hundley v. Bisso Properties 858 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 10-11 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Penn v. Options, Inc. 858 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Weeks v. Angelo Iafrate Construction Co. 850 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    23:1221(3)(c)(i); Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Mack v. Cerro Copper Tube 850 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Jones v. Ruskin Mfg., 36,548 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), ; Cox v. Roofing Supply, Inc., 36,275 (La.App.2d Cir.08/14/02), .
  • Degrasse v. Elevating Boats, Inc. 850 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Dales v. Ceco Concrete Const. 849 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/01/97), .
  • Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Frantz 847 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (alteration in original), the supreme court clearly set out the standard of review for factual findings in workers' compensation matters as follows: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Jones v. General Motors Corp. 847 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), 704 So.2d *15 1161; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Short v. Allen Johnson Builders, Inc. 847 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. 96-2840, pp. 8-9 (La.7/1/97), , the supreme court stated as follows: “The purpose of SEBs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Foy-Watson v. General Motors Corp. 847 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Nolan, supra .