DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bivins, 696 So. 2d 551.

675 citing documents.

  • Thomas v. Wal-Mart 849 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Bell v. AOA Services 845 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Prestwood v. City of Slidell 849 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Chelette v. RIVERWOOD INTERN. USA, INC. 843 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); ; La.R.S.
  • Pugh v. MAGIC 843 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Firmin v. St. Mary Parish School Board 843 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Troutman v. Hart 844 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Dressel v. Topeka Transfer & Storage 844 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Boudreaux v. Ideal Rentals, Inc. 844 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Bodiford v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln Mercury 844 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Howard v. Holyfield Const., Inc. 839 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Hallaron v. JACOB'S ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 839 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), , citing Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/94), -38 .
  • Flintroy v. Scott Cummins Salvage 839 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
  • Hebert v. Calahan 839 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Armstrong v. Horseshoe Casino 839 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Culotta v. AL & W. Moore Trucking Co. 839 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    The burdens of proof in an SEB workers' compensation case were set out by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), , as follows: "The purpose of SEBs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident."
  • Alexis v. Alton Ochsner Foundation Hospital 869 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688 (La.12/02/97); ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Authement v. Shappert Engineering 840 So. 2d 1181 La. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • City of Eunice v. Carrier 844 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Davis v. Cippriani's Italian Restaurant 844 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Tynes v. Gaylord Container Corp. 844 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Lowe's Companies, Inc. v. LeBlanc 839 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Kennedy v. Camellia Garden Manor 838 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review applied in workers’ compensation matters is set out in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , 556: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Darby v. Gilbert Richard, Inc. 838 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97); , 556 as follows: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Moore v. City of New Orleans 839 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Lee v. Schumpert 836 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    23:1221(3)(c)(i); Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Godeaux v. Lewis Chapman Construction Co. 836 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; (La.App.
  • Carignan v. LOUISIANA COMPRESSOR MAINT. CO. 836 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Palmer v. Schooner Petroleum Services 834 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review in a worker's compensation hearing was set out in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , 556 as follows: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Dulin v. Levis Mitsubishi, Inc. 836 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Jones v. Ruskin Mfg. 834 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • McCraw v. Dime Mortgage Co. 833 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Gilcrease v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 843 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., 619 *
  • Bolton v. Mike Fleming Const. 833 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Figueroa v. Hardtner Medical Center, supra .
  • Piatkowski v. Wal-Mart Stores 835 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Smith v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc. 835 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698, pp. 5-6 (La.1/14/94), ; Brown v. Coastal Construction & Engineering, Inc., 96-2705, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Rose v. Lowe's of Alexandria 829 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Green v. L & F Constr., Inc. 829 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    LAW AND DISCUSSION In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , the supreme court reviewed the standard of appellate review in workers’ compensation cases stating the following: In applying the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, the appellate court must determine not whether the trier of fact was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was a reasonable o
  • Flanders v. McDonald's Restaurant 828 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Guest House of Slidell v. Wilson 835 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Container Co. 834 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review in a workers' compensation hearing was set out in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97); , 556 as follows: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Perkins v. Radiator Shop, Inc. 829 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 98-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Franklin v. Georgia-Pacific Port Hudson Division 835 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Cox v. Roofing Supply, Inc. 825 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Williams 824 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    The Police Jury contends that this was a valid job offer because it met all of the requirements of Banks v. Industrial Roofing and Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Killett v. Sanderson Farms 818 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Savoy v. Double Diamond Casino 816 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    *976 LAW AND DISCUSSION In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-C-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , the supreme court reviewed the standard of appellate review in workers’ compensation cases stating the following: In applying the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, the appellate court must determine not whether the trier of fact was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was a reasonable o
  • Teer v. Alt Transportation 5006 817 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/01/97), ; Nolan, supra.
  • Williams v. Orleans Parish School Board 817 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 *293 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Lanthier v. Family Dollar Store 813 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review in a workers' compensation hearing was set out in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , 556: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.