DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bivins, 696 So. 2d 551.

675 citing documents.

  • Paul Magbee v. Federal Express La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    7/1/97), that a suitable job exists within Mr. Magbee’s and FedEx’s community or reasonable geographic region; at a wage Mr. Magbee, considering his experience and training, would be expected to earn; and that the position actually existed when FedEx notified Mr. Magbee about the opening.
  • Broadway v. Shane Mitchell Logging, Inc. 105 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), , citing Smith v. La.
  • Harrison v. Madison Parish School Board 108 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Alley v. Perini/O & G Indus., 44,268 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/09), .
  • Villar v. Industrial Metal Recyclers 111 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Gee Cee Group, Inc. v. Thomas 103 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Angela Leonards v. Summit Claims La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • O'Neal v. Town of Rayville 107 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Dombrowski v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Co., 46,249 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/11), .
  • Leonards v. Summit Claims 101 So. 3d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The majority’s interpretation is consistent with Banks v. Industrial Roofing and Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2480 (La.7/1/97), and Clay v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, 11-1797 (La.5/8/12), .
  • Juneau v. Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System 103 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Both the appellant and appellee cite Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., (La.
  • Pitre v. Buddy's Seafood 102 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Griffin v. Interim LSU Public Hospital 97 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 12/22/10), (citing Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 6 (La.7/1/97), ).
  • Roberts v. State/Office of Family Support 97 So. 3d 570 La. 2012
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, discussing the meaning of “job *573 availability,” held that an employer may discharge its burden of proving “job availability” under La.
  • Richert v. Schindler Elevator Corp. 97 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Bernard Parish Sheriff’s Office, 09-2793 (La.1/9/11), , citing Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Hall v. Macpapers, Inc. 95 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 12/22/10), (citing Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 6 (La.7/1/97), ).
  • Clay v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 93 So. 3d 536 La. 2012
    Poissenot, 56 So.3d at 174 ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Redmann v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance 88 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 5/24/11) , , writ denied, 11-1321 (La.9/30/11), , citing Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Richardson v. North Oaks Hospital 91 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Butler v. L & N Food Stores 91 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “The purpose of [SEBs] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “The purpose of [SEBs] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Gray v. Marriott Residence Inn 85 So. 3d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), , quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • Johnson v. T & J Hauling Co. 86 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Dombrowski v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, 46,249 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/11), .
  • Locicero v. New Orleans Paint & Drywall Service 86 So. 3d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Barbara Richard v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    7/1/97), (emphasis added), wherein our supreme court opined as follows: Initially, the employee bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the injury resulted in his inability to earn that amount under the facts and circumstances of the individua
  • Richard v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 79 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Roofing and Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 8-9 (La.7/1/97), (emphasis added), wherein our supreme court opined as follows: Initially, the employee bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the *362 evidence, that the injury resulted in his inability to earn that amount under the facts and circumstances of the individual case.
  • Richard v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 125 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bernard Parish Sheriff’s Office, 09-2793, pp. 4-6 (La.1/9/11), -75 (footnote omitted): “The purpose of [SEBs] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • John Briscoe v. McNeese State University La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Briscoe v. McNeese State University 80 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Kent Normand v. Dresser Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Slade v. State ex rel. University of Louisiana at Monroe 79 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Normand v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 79 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Brandon v. Motors Liquidation Co. 79 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 1996-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Dombrowski v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, 46,249 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/11), .
  • Angie Brown v. Shop Rite, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    7/1/97), (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
  • Brown v. Shop Rite, Inc. 75 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “The purpose of [SEBs] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
  • Silverman v. Weatherford International, Inc. 83 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Dombrowski, supra; Koenig, supra.
  • James Sharp v. Landscape Management Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1/9/11), - 75: “The purpose of [SEBs] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” 5 Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Brenda Williams v. State of Louisiana, Thru the Dept. of Social Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96- 2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
  • Barbara Richard v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    7/1/97), (emphasis added), wherein our supreme court opined as follows: Initially, the employee bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the injury resulted in his inability to earn that amount under the facts and circumstances of the individua
  • Williams v. State Ex Rel. Department of Social Services 74 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
  • Sharp v. LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 74 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bernard Parish Sheriff’s Office, 09-2793, pp. 4-6 (La.1/9/11), , 174-75: “The purpose of [SEBs] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Kinchen v. City of Shreveport 73 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Patterson v. General Motors Co. 73 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    He first contends the WCJ applied the wrong burden of proof: by requiring him to show “that he could not find employment elsewhere,” the WCJ improperly shifted the burden from the employer to the claimant, contrary to Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , and Turner v. Sunbelt Mfg., 32,691 (La.App.
  • Ford v. HOUSE OF RAEFORD 71 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Dean v. Southmark Constr., 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Davenport v. Foster Farms, L.L.C. 69 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Co., 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 70 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Janneck v. LWCC 70 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, a fact-finder’s choice between them can never be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Novitsky v. ROTOLO CONSULTANTS, INC. 68 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Dwayne Olivier v. City of Eunice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 9 (La.7/1/97), La.R.S.
  • Olivier v. City of Eunice 66 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 9 (La.7/1/97), ; La.R.S.
  • Kelly v. TJ MAXX 67 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .