In re Mithun
In re Mithun, 737 So. 2d 1 (La. 1998).
Cited by
- Theresa Fisher v. Steven Harter, Jr. La. 2024
- State of Louisiana Versus Timothy P. Roussel La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State v. Kory Mattox State 257 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Gourgues 204 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Mack 152 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Myers 145 So. 3d 320 La. 2014
- State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 932 La. 2014
- Louisiana State Board of Nursing v. Gautreaux 39 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- In Re Commitment of Cf 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
- STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMANDA GUTWEILER AKA AMANDA HYPES La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Gutweiler 940 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Opinion text
ORDER Considering the foregoing Joint Petition for Interim Suspension: IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Richard James Mithum, attorney at law, be and hereby is, placed on interim suspension from the practice of law, said suspension to be effective immediately, and remaining in effect until further orders of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that from the date of the filing of the petition until the effective date of the interim suspension, respondent shall not undertake the representation of new clients and shall fully comply with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute appropriate disciplinary proceedings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11. /s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana MARCUS, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 11, § 3.