Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Mithun, 737 So. 2d 1.

18 citing documents.

Theresa Fisher v. Steven Harter, Jr. La. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Timothy P. Roussel La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Kory Mattox State 257 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/13/99), , 5 ; State v. Trosclair , , 1102 (La.1983), cert.
State v. Gourgues 204 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Mack 152 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
184 , and In re Grand Jury, 1998-2277 (La.4/13/99), .
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Myers 145 So. 3d 320 La. 2014
In re Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 932 La. 2014
In re Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/18/99), ; cert, dismissed, 468 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct.
Louisiana State Board of Nursing v. Gautreaux 39 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In re Grand Jury, 98-2277, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), .
In Re Commitment of Cf 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4/13/99), ,11 (quoting First National Bank of Boston v. Bcllolti.
State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
While the motion to quash was pending the district court's ruling, the State filed a "Motion to Show Compelling Necessity for the Release of Grand Jury Information as Mandated by In re Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/13/99), , with Incorporated Authorities."
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMANDA GUTWEILER AKA AMANDA HYPES La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4/13/99)[,] with Incorporated Authorities” (motion to show necessity).
State v. Gutweiler 940 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
On the same date, the prosecution filed a "Motion to Show Compelling Necessity for the Release of Grand Jury Information as Mandated by In re Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/13/99)[,] , with Incorporated Authorities" (motion to show necessity).
Pettibone v. Belt 843 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Re: Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/13/99), .
State v. Poland 782 So. 2d 556 La. 2001
In In re Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/13/99), , 6, this court, quoting Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218-219 , 99 S.Ct.
In re Mithun 776 So. 2d 426 La. 2001
In re: Mithun, 98-3046 (La.12/16/98), .
In Re Touchet 753 So. 2d 820 La. 2000
In re: Touchet, 98-2879 (La.12/18/98), .
State v. Poland 750 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
A recent pronouncement by the Louisiana Supreme Court in In Re Grand Jury, 98-2277 (La.4/13/99), , outlined the considerations for secrecy in the grand jury: _Jj2Secrecy helps to prevent the escape of prospective indictees by providing no forewarning to them of the investigation in progress; it insures that the grand jury investigation can proceed freely by protecting the grand jurors from outside influences and
In re Erin B. 751 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999