Oxley v. Sattler
Also decided on this docket: La., November 20, 1998 728 So. 2d 878
Oxley v. Sattler, 739 So. 2d 183 (La. 1999).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
Distinguished in 1 Explained in 3
- Alvin Jones v. Buck Kreihs Marine Repair, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
- Rosenblat Properties, LLC v. Shweta Kohsmann La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Brittany Cavet v. Abc Insurance Company and Maison St. Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Daniel Bennett v. Demco Energy Services, Llc, Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, Cox La. 2024
- Zach Bellard v. Atk Construction, Llc, Et Al. La. 2023
- Marcus Hebert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Zach Bellard v. Atk Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- James K Fawvor v. Edmund E. Caswell, III. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Michael Leblanc and Jill Leblanc v. Michael E. Powers Construction, Inc. and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Cubic Energy, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, … 252 So. 3d 431 La. 2018
- City of Youngsville v. C. H. Fenstermaker & Assocs., L.L.C. 244 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- City of Youngsville v. C. H. Fenstermaker & Associates, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Oxley v. Sattler 710 So. 2d 261
- Jenkins v. Senyetter 728 So. 2d 878
Opinion text
739 So.2d 183 (1999) Kenneth OXLEY v. Stanley SATTLER, et al. No. 98-C-1864. Supreme Court of Louisiana. April 23, 1999. Joseph J. Bailey, James Michael Chamblee, Albin Alexandre Provosty, Provosty, Sadler & Delaunay, Alexandria, for Applicant. William Preston Crews, Jr., Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur & Corkern, Natchitoches, for Respondent. Prior report: 710 So.2d 261 . PER CURIAM. [*] Upon defendants' application, we granted certiorari in this case. 98-1864 (La.11/20/98), 728 So.2d 878 . After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of November 20, 1998 as improvidently granted, and deny defendants' application. TRAYLOR, J., dissents. NOTES [*] Victory, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.