In re Beall
In re Beall, 745 So. 2d 1172 (La. 1999).
Cited by
- In Re: Keelus Renardo Miles La. 2023
- In Re: Harold D. Register La. 2018
- In Re: Phyllis A. Southall 165 So. 3d 894 La. 2015
- In re Wainwright 91 So. 3d 304 La. 2012
- In re Linscomb 125 So. 3d 1054 La. 2012
- In re McDonald 60 So. 3d 602 La. 2011
- In Re Hood 5 So. 3d 101 La. 2009
- In re Thornton 876 So. 2d 781 La. 2004
- In re Lacobee 866 So. 2d 237 La. 2004
- In re Small 863 So. 2d 500 La. 2003
- In re Welcome 840 So. 2d 519 La. 2003
- In re Dunn 831 So. 2d 889 La. 2002
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hyde v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 721 So. 2d 913
Opinion text
ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR PER CURIAM. * Petitioner, Paul Christopher Beall, was denied permission to sit for the July 1998 bar examination by the Committee on Bar Admissions based on character and fitness concerns. This court issued an order permitting the petitioner to take the examination, with the provision that upon satisfactorily passing, petitioner could apply for appointment of a commissioner to take evidence and report to this court as to whether he has the appropriate character and fitness to be admitted to the bar and allowed to practice law. In re Beall, 99-1830 (La.7/9/98), 721 So.2d 913 . Petitioner successfully passed the bar examination, and we thereafter appointed a commissioner. After taking evidence, the commissioner concluded that petitioner possessed the requisite character and fitness for admission to the bar. Based on our review of the commissioner’s findings and recommendation, it is the judgment of this court that petitioner is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of one year. Any misconduct during this one year period may terminate the conditional right to practice, or subject petitioner to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement. Knoll, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.