Biggs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 21, 1927 8 La. App. 706; La., March 15, 1887 39 La. Ann. 294; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 25, 1974 298 So. 2d 146
Biggs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 152 So. 2d 596 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963).
Cited by
- Dunaway v. Spain 468 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Mardis v. Hollanger 426 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Huval Tractor, Inc. v. Journet 413 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Pike Burden Printing, Inc. v. Pike Burden, Inc. 396 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Beasley v. Martin 253 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Smith, Howard & McCoy, Inc. v. Acme General Contractors, Inc. 153 So. 2d 881 La. 1963
- Willis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 153 So. 2d 774 La. 1963
- Smith, Howard & McCoy, Inc. v. Acme Wellpoint Corp. 152 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Willis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 152 So. 2d 593
Opinion text
HARDY, Judge. This is a suit by plaintiff wife and her husband seeking recovery of damages for personal injury and medical expenses, respectively. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs the defendants have appealed. This is a companion suit which was consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal with the suit of Mark C. Willis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, et al., La.App., 152 So.2d 593 . The only distinction between these cases would be with respect to the quantum of the award. The judgment appealed from allowed recovery in favor of the plaintiff husband for medical expenses, etc., in the sum of $612.30, and in favor of plaintiff wife in the sum of $4,500.00 for pain and suffering. Our examination of the record has failed to disclose any error in the reasons of the district judge upon which these awards were based. We are of the opinion that they are neither inadequate nor excessive. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellants’ cost.