Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Parks v. Hall, 181 So. 191.

81 citing documents.

Rhodes v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 75 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Talbot v. Allstate Insurance Company 76 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
The "initial permission" rule has been applied in the following cases: Parks v. Hall, 1938, , 181 So.
Longwell v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. 63 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
The above holding is based upon a previous holding, , 181 So.
Attaway v. Lanusse 62 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
947 , and Jackson v. Cook, La.App., , however, under the facts the doctrines of last clear chance or discovery of peril are not applicable.
Fulco v. City Ice Service 59 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
Collard v. Globe Indemnity Co. 50 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
The language employed in the policy is to be construed so as to effectuate the insurance and not for the purpose of defeating it; * * *' [ , 181 So.
Sun Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co. 47 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
the first instance, irrespective of the use to which he put it while in his possession, was "permission" of the assured within the meaning and contemplation of the "omnibus clause" and the insurer is therefore liable to plaintiff thereunder.'" , 181 So.
Dominguez v. American Casualty Co. 46 So. 2d 744 La. 1950
Waits v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 40 So. 2d 746 La. 1949
Waits v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 40 So. 2d 746 La. 1949
Louisiana Fire Ins. Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co. 38 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Dominguez v. American Casualty Co. 37 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Clostio's Heirs v. Sinclair Refining Co. 36 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co. 36 So. 2d 9 La. 1948
Waits v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 33 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
us, therefore, involves an interpretation of the familiar omnibus clause embodied in the policy of insurance issued by defendant under which Gillis, the owner of the truck, was the named insured, and a , 181 So.
Nyman v. Monteleone-Iberville Garage, Inc. 30 So. 2d 123 La. 1947
An employee, to be an ‘additional assured’ within the meaning of the omnibus clause, must be one who is using his employer’s automobile at the time of the accident, with permission of his employer.” See, also, , 181 So.
Warren v. Globe Indemnity Co. 30 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co. 29 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
The first case to reach the Supreme Court of this state that involved the issue of coverage under a provision in a policy of the character as that now before us, , 181 So.
Hemel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 29 So. 2d 483 La. 1947
Nyman v. Monteleone-Iberville Garage 25 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Clemons v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. 18 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Distinguished Wilson v. Farnsworth 4 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
As authority for their contention that the "omnibus clause" of the policy of public liability insurance involved in the instant case extends coverage to Wilson Farnsworth as the driver of the truck, , 181 So.
Farnet v. De Cuers 196 So. 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
It is proper to say, then, that in taking the car from the curb with the purpose of ultimately placing it in the garage, , 181 So.
Farnet v. Decuers 195 So. 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Donovan v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana 197 So. 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Perrodin v. Thibodeaux 191 So. 148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
Haeuser v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 187 So. 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 190 So. 565 La. 1939
Haeuser v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 185 So. 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
The Supreme Court of Louisiana has adopted the latter view and, , 181 So.
Parks v. Hall 182 So. 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Writs of review were granted to plaintiffs by the Supreme Court, .
Matheny v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 181 So. 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938