Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 232 So. 2d 285.

162 citing documents.

Percy v. State, EA Conway Memorial Hosp. 478 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Bellamy v. Janssen 477 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
RAYNE STATE BANK & TR. CO. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Blanchard v. Reeves 469 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Loupe v. Avondale Shipyards 470 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(1970), holds that constructive notice sufficient to put the plaintiff on guard and call for inquiry is tantamount to knowledge.
In re Filiation of Jones 463 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Cartwright v. Chrysler Cor *964 poration, supra [ , (1970)]; Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., 139 La.
Henderson v. Todd Shipyards 462 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Ledet v. Miller 459 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Quattlebaum v. Hy-Reach Equipment Inc. 453 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Sturm v. Zelden and Zelden 445 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
at 287 (1970), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: "...
General American Oil Co. of Texas v. Meche 442 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1970) provides: “The rule that prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring suit, applies only when such ignorance is not wilful and does not result from negligence ...
Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Pierson 428 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
La.Civ.Code art. 3537; , (1970).
West v. Gajdzik 425 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Corsey v. State, Dept. of Corrections, supra; , (1970); Sumerall v. St.
Simpson v. Department of Health & Human Resources 423 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lott v. Haley; Cartwright v. Chrysler Corporation [ ], , (La.1970); (La.App.
Melancon v. Continental Oil Co. 420 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Bennett v. General Motors Corp. 420 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Succession of Rovira v. BOARD OF COM'RS 418 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Landry v. Pierre Part Natural Gas Co. 413 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Sciacca v. Polizzi 403 So. 2d 728 La. 1981
Reed v. General Motors Corp. 400 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Sciacca v. Polizzi 394 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
598 , (1970), the court said: “While there are numerous appellate court decisions providing, ‘A manufacturer or seller of a product which involves a risk or injury to the user is liable to any person, whether the purchaser or a third person, who without fault on his part sustains an injury caused by a defect in the design o
Lee v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of US 391 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Castrillo v. Stimulation Technology, Inc. 393 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
598 , (1970), the court said: “.
Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 387 So. 2d 574 La. 1980
Powell v. Department of Highways 383 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
598 , (1970) the court said the following with respect to C.C.
Hebert v. Confederate Memorial Medical Center 381 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
598 , (1970), and Quick, supra, as authority for sustaining defendant's plea of prescription.
Stafford v. Division of Administration 380 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 378 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
598 , our Supreme Court stated as follows the rule as to what is sufficient notice to the plaintiff to commence the running of prescription: "Whatever is notice enough to excite attention and put the owner on his guard and call for inquiry is tantamount to knowledge or notice of every thing to which inquiry may le
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 375 So. 2d 1319 La. 1979
Yarbrough v. Louisiana Cement Co., Inc. 370 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
598 , at page 287: "* * * Also, it is not necessary that the party have actual knowledge of the conditions as long as there is `constructive notice.'
Nathan v. Carter 372 So. 2d 560 La. 1979
598 , (1970); Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., 139 La.
Lott v. Haley 370 So. 2d 521 La. 1979
Fleur De Leis Apts v. DAVIDSON SASH, ETC. 364 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Fiberglass Insulators, Inc. 367 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
598 , (1970), the Supreme Court noted the contra non valentem doctrine has been infrequently applied in Louisiana cases.
Nathan v. Carter 367 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Sumerall v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 366 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
598 , (1970), the court stated constructive knowledge to be: ".
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 366 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Lott v. Haley 363 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
598 , (1970); Marguette Casualty Company v. Brown, 235 La.
Carroll v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 363 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Sartin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 359 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
598 , (1970), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the injured party need not have actual knowledge of the conditions to start the running of prescription as long as there is "constructive notice," i. e., "(W)hatever is notice enough to excite attention .
Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 354 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Brown v. State, Through Dept. of Correction 354 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Bayonne v. Hartford Ins. Co. 353 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
598 , (1970), knowledge of the fact is presumed where plaintiff has sufficient information to incite her curiosity as to the cause of the injury, (La.App.
Blalock v. American Emp. Ins. Co. 345 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Quick v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 347 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
598 , (1970), the court stated constructive knowledge to be: ".
Dauzat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 336 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
598 , (1970), the Louisiana Supreme Court expounded on the doctrine of constructive notice: ".
Duhon v. Saloom 323 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
598 , *205 (1970); Cert.
Blouin v. Loyola University 325 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
598 , , 287: "The rule that prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring suit, applies only when such ignorance is not wilful and does not result from negligence, and the doctrine has been limited to cases where the debtor has concealed the fact of the oblig
Culotta v. Police Jury of Ascension Parish 316 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
598 , (1970), the Supreme Court stated: ".
Marcel v. Hospital Corp. of Sisters of Saint Joseph 322 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975