DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 4 So. 2d 607.

26 citing documents.

  • Mayon v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 191 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Crimp v. LeBlanc Lumber Co. (La.App., 1948), , Fontenot v. LaFleur (La.App., 1960) , and D & D Planting Co. v. Employers Gas Co. (1960) 240 La.
  • Stubblefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 157 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Warnick, et al. v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., (1st Cir. 1941); Braud v. Vinet, et al., La.App., (1st Cir. 1942); Williamson v. De Soto Wholesale Grocery Company, Inc., et al., La.App., (2d Cir. 1943); Sun Underwriters Insurance Company v. Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan, et al., La.App., (Orl.
  • Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 133 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    1 Cir., ; Vowell v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.
  • Towles v. Jones 98 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    798 , , and Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
  • Lavergne v. Indemnity Insurance Co. 84 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    238 ; Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Central Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Linkenhoger, La.App., .
  • Ruth v. Royal Indemnity Co. 83 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    72; Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Braud v. Vinet, La.App., ; Williamson v. De Soto Wholesale Grocery Co., La.App., ; Sun Underwriters Ins.
  • Broussard v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. of Newark 80 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    238 ; Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; Boland Mach.
  • Rhea v. Farrington 78 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    in which they were .treated somewhat at length.
  • Simms v. Lawrence Bros. 72 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    377 , Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , Cole v. Burgess, La.App., , and Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
  • Simms v. Lawrence Bros. 72 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    377 , Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , Cole v. Burgess, La.App., , and Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
  • Johnson v. Lowrey 70 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    ■ LSA-Civil Code art. 2320; Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App.1941, ; G’Sell v. Cassagne, La.App.
  • Watts v. Spikes 60 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    In Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., , the Court stated; “We are once more faced with the ever-recurring proposition of negligence, vel non, of a driver driving an automobile on the highway at night and running into the rear end of a parked or stopped vehicle that has no signal lights or any other warning device to indicate its presence on the highw
  • Rea v. Dow Motor Co. 36 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Loret v. Armour Co. 32 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , is sound and can be appropriately used here.
  • Warren v. Globe Indemnity Co. 30 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , 611, from which we quote: "* * * The trial judge, basing his opinion principally on the case of Cusimano v. A. S. Spiess Sales Company, 153 La.
  • Hebert v. Texas Pac. Ry. Co. 28 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., ; Brown Y. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines, La.
  • Boland M. M. Co. v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 22 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., ; Holcomb v. Perry, 19 La.
  • Herring v. Holicer Gas Co. 22 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., ; Holloway v. Pure Oil Company, 17 La.
  • Hogue v. Akin Truck Line 16 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    238 ; Warnick et al. v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
  • Williamson v. De Soto Wholesale Grocery Co. 16 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    In Braud v. Vinet, La.App., , 203, decided by the First Circuit and cited by counsel for plaintiffs, the opinion, referring to the rule of deviation and the further rule of re-entry, contained the following observations: " , in which they were treated somewhat at length.
  • McCook v. Rebecca-Fabacher 10 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    It was a different picture than was the one presented to the driver of the approaching car in the case of Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., , in which we held the driver of that car blameless for failing to have seen the trailer in time before running into it.
  • Braud v. Vinet 5 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    in which they were treated somewhat at length.
  • Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission 4 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    this day handed down, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
  • Ledet v. Louisiana Highway Commission 4 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    this day handed down, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
  • Ledet v. Louisiana Highway Commission 4 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Charles M. Warnick and others v. Louisiana Highway Commission, *West Page 616 , this day handed down, the judgment appealed from is hereby amended by increasing the award from $750 to $1,250, and as thus amended affirmed.
  • Bateman v. Louisiana Highway Commission 4 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    this day handed down, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be amended by increasing the sum awarded *West Page 615 from $8,000 to $10,000 to each of the said plaintiffs, thus making a total award of $20,000 to the plaintiffs, with the further award of $60 to plaintiff Murphy Bateman, and as thus amended aff