DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dean, 625 So. 2d 146.

197 citing documents.

  • State v. Jones 767 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    art. 404 B(1); State v. Cangelosi, 98-589 (La.App.
  • State v. Maise 759 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Black 757 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hester 746 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hernandez 735 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Cangelosi 722 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Sterling, 95-673 (La.App.
  • State v. Willis 721 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    see also State v. Crawford, 95-1352 (La.App.
  • State v. McArthur 719 So. 2d 1037 La. 1998
  • State v. Miller 718 So. 2d 960 La. 1998
  • State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Brown 719 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the requirements for the admissibility of other crimes evidence: Generally, evidence of other acts of misconduct is not admissible; however, there are statutory and jurisprudential exceptions to this rule.
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
    ("[when] the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act was committed."); rev'd on other grounds, 508 U.S. 275 , 1
  • State v. Carter 713 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Lisotta 712 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    in which a grandfather was charged with sexually molesting his granddaughters.
  • State v. Winn 705 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    our Supreme Court reiterated these conditions: The state is required to prove that the defendant committed these other acts by clear and convincing evidence.
  • State v. Miller 704 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Mattox 704 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Nicholson 703 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Code, 627 So.2d at 1381 .
  • State v. Blackwell 701 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Cotton 703 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Wilkerson 704 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. McArthur 702 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Finally, as to Defendant's claim that the two other offenses should not have been admitted because of remoteness in time, we note our ruling in Crawford, 672 So.2d at 208-209 , : We find that the time between the other crimes evidence and the offense charged is but one factor to be considered when balancing probative value, prejudicial effect and relevancy.
  • State v. Lagrange 702 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Bryant 694 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Humphrey 694 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Barnes 685 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Campbell 683 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Walker 681 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Langley 680 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Coleman 673 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Williams 672 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    -149 (La.1993): Generally, evidence of other acts of misconduct is not admissible; however, there are statutory and jurisprudential exceptions to this rule.
  • State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    the court explained: In summation, for the evidence to be admissible, the state must comply with the notice requirements and limiting instructions set out in Prieur , prove with clear and convincing evidence that the other acts or crimes occurred and were committed by defendant, demonstrate that the other a
  • State v. Reddick 670 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    In determining the evidence admissible to show intent, which allows proof of “similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed,” where “the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged.” In that case involving a defendant charged with molesting his granddaughter, the Louisiana Supre
  • State v. Sturdivant 669 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Free, 26,267 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), , writ denied, 94-2846 (La.
  • State v. Green 666 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "Generally, evidence of other acts of misconduct is not admissible ...
  • State v. Ham 652 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Tregre 649 So. 2d 376 La. 1995
  • State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Allen 647 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Free 643 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Dean 643 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Briscoe v. Briscoe 641 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Millet 640 So. 2d 1329 La. 1994
    -152 (La.1993), and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Code 627 So. 2d 1373 La. 1993