cl-7267399
Precedential
Processed
Ducournau v. Levistones
Ducournau v. Levistones, 4 La. Ann. 30 (1849).
Cited by
- Mundy v. Phillips 102 So. 519 La. 1924
- Wemple v. Eastham 90 So. 637 La. 1922
- Girod v. Monroe Brick Co. 53 So. 582 La. 1910
- Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R. 40 So. 525 La. 1906
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Verdier v. Leprete 4 La. 41
Opinion text
The judgment of the court was pronounced by Slidell, J. The Code of Practice is positive that if the appellant does not file the transcript seasonably, tbe appeal shall be considered as abandoned, and the appellant shall not be afterwards allowed to renew it. C. P. 594, 4 La. 41 . The omission is attributed by the appellant to the fault of his attorney. We stated, on a former occasion, that this could not be recognized as a ground of relief. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasons then given. See same case 3 An. p. 245. Appeal dismissed,.