Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co., 53 So. 582 (La. 1910).
Cited by
- Bell v. Malouf 128 So. 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Richardson v. Henderson Sugar Refinery Co. 7 La. App. 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Rooney v. Checker Cab Co. 4 La. App. 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
- Day v. Goff 2 La. App. 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
- Braud v. Huth 98 So. 664 La. 1923
- Edenborn v. Kirkland 68 So. 111 La. 1915
- Board of Com'rs v. Howard Land & Timber Co. 61 So. 868 La. 1913
- Vasquez v. Vasquez 62 So. 123 La. 1913
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Treadaway 126 La. 300
- Brooks v. Smith 120 La. 454
- Verdier v. Leprete 4 La. 41
- Ducournau v. Levistones 4 La. Ann. 30
- Collins v. Monticou 9 La. Ann. 39
- Brickell v. Conner 10 La. Ann. 235
- Tarlton v. Wofford 15 La. Ann. 592
- Berhil v. Fisk 24 La. Ann. 149
- 31 La. Ann. 858 not in our corpus
- 33 La. Ann. 810 not in our corpus
- 35 La. Ann. 841 not in our corpus
- World's Industrial & Cotton Centennial Exposition v. Crescent City Railroad 39 La. Ann. 355
- 48 La. Ann. 1459 not in our corpus
- State v. Louisiana Debenture Co. 52 La. Ann. 551
- Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R. 116 La. 42
- Hudson v. Garrett 47 La. Ann. 1534
- Mutual Loan & Building Ass'n v. First African Baptist Church 48 La. Ann. 1458
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal. MONROE, J. Defendant (appellee) moves to dismiss the appeal herein, on the ground that, a previous appeal' from the same judgment having been dismissed because appellant failed to lodge the transcript in this court within the delay allowed by law, no subsequent appeal can be allowed. The facts being as stated (C. C. Girod v. Monroe Brick Co., 126 La. 300 , 52 South. 550 ), the motion must be sustained. “When an appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellant to file the transcript in time, it is considered abandoned, and cannot afterwards be renewed.” Brooks et al. v. Smith et al., 120 La. 454 , 45 South. 388 , and authorities there cited. See, also, Dozier v. Sargent, 4 La. 41 ; Ducournau v. Levistones, 4 La. Ann. 30 ; Collins v. Monticou, 9 La. Ann. 39 ; Brickell v. Conner, 10 La. Ann. 235 ; Tarleton v. Wofford, 15 La. Ann. 592 ; Redmond v. Mann et al., 24 La. Ann. 149 ; Laussade v. Maury et al, 31 La. Ann. 858 ; Pierce v. Cushing, 33 La. Ann. 810 ; Sterling v. Heirs of Sterling, 35 La. Ann. 841 ; World’s Exposition v. Railroad Co., 39 La. Ann. 355 , 1 South. 791 ; Building & Loan Ass’n v. Church, 48 La. Ann. 1459 , 21 South. 24 ; State v. Louisiana Debenture Co., Ltd., 52 La. Ann. 551 , 27 South. 27 ; Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R. R. Co., 116 La. 42 , 40 South. 525 . “For a failure to file the transcript, which presumes an abandonment of the appeal, the motion [to dismiss] can be filed at any time after the filing of the transcript.” Hudson v. Garrett, 47 La. Ann. 1534 , 18 South. 510 ; Building & Loan Ass’n v. Church, 48 La. Ann. 1458 , 21 South. 24 . It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal herein be dismissed at the cost of the appellant.