Collins v. Monticou
Collins v. Monticou, 9 La. Ann. 39 (1854).
Cited by
- Richardson v. Henderson Sugar Refinery Co. 7 La. App. 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Girod v. Monroe Brick Co. 53 So. 582 La. 1910
- Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R. 40 So. 525 La. 1906
Opinion text
Campbell, J. The plaintiff and appellee move to dismiss the appeal, on the ground, that a previous appeal was taken and abandoned by the appellant. *40 The record discloses that, on the 28d May, 1832, a suspensive appeal was ' granted on the petition of appellant, and that the required bond was filed the same day. It further appears, that this appeal was never brought up ; but that in December of the same year, appellant applied for and obtained the devolutive appeal now before the Court. . The appeal taken, having thus been abandoned, cannot be renewed. C. P. 594. Dozer v. Sargent, 4 L. 41 . Roberts v. Beuler, 1 R. 100 . It is therefore decreed, that this appeal be dismissed at the costs of appellant.