Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 773 So. 2d 694.

99 citing documents.

Roderick O. Newman v. Concordia Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Lwcc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
11/28/00); stated: The amount of attorney fees rests within the discretion of the workers’ compensation judge, as long as that amount is supported by the record.
Jeanne Terrebonne v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
11/ 28/ 00), 9 ANSWER TO APPEAL Because we affirm all portions of the appealed judgment in Ms. Terrebonne' s favor, we also grant the relief sought in her answer to the Hospital' s appeal.
Damon W. Ryan v. Cajun Industries, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 10/30/02), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
Musson Patout Automotive Group v. Jimmy Maynard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
11/28/00), the supreme court held: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
Frank Miller (Jonathan Miller-Deceased) v. Rayville Manufacturing La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Mary Ortega v. Cantu Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
11/28/00), the supreme court held: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
Rapheal Guillory, Jr. v. R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/28/00), the Supreme Court stated: The amount [of statutory attorney fees] awarded rests within the discretion of the workers’ compensation judge, as long as that amount is supported by the record.
Guillory v. R&R Constr., Inc. 241 So. 3d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/00), ,700, the Supreme Court stated: The amount [of statutory attorney fees] awarded rests within the discretion of the workers' compensation judge, as long as that amount is supported by the record.
James Crawford Bailey v. Veolia Environmental Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/28/00), for the proposition that an attorney should be compensated for all the work from the inception of the case.
Bailey v. Veolia Envtl. Servs. 237 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/00), , for the proposition that an attorney should be compensated for all the work from the inception of the case.
Marvin Tellis v. Ash Timber Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00)
Tellis v. Ash Timber Co. 190 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Friedman v. Ecolab, Inc. 187 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
23:1201(F)(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; J.P.
Bonnie Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
11/28/00), (footnote omitted) (emphasis added), the supreme court held that an award of statutory attorney fees is intended to fully reimburse the employee for all amounts expended in their claim: 19 In our determination of the respective rights of the employee
Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co. 185 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, pp. 9-10 (La.11/28/00), (footnote omitted) (emphasis added), the supreme court héld that an award of statutory attorney fees is intended to fully reimburse the employee for all amounts expended in their claim: |20In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive f
Marshall v. Town of Winnsboro 184 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00) ; J.P.
Nitcher v. Northshore Regional Medical Center 182 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), -98 .
Cecilia Rachal v. Wal-Mart Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
11/28/00), Fabacher v. Stine, Inc., 13-471 (La.App.
Rachal v. Wal-Mart Corp. 165 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; Fabacher v. Stine, Inc., 13-471 (La.App.
Bradford v. Jury 139 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; J.P.
Robert Burke v. Venture Transport Logistics, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
11/28/00), (citations omitted), stated: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
Burke v. Venture Transport Logistics, LLC 131 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Court sets a reasonable attorney’s fee in the amount of Six Thousand Dollars.” Our supreme court, in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, p. 9 (La.11/28/00), (citations omitted), stated: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
John Carriere v. Patients Care Medical Supply La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/28/00), this court raised the attorney fee award from $7,000.00 to $12,000.00 rather than to the amount sought, finding that some of the time spent 6 “Some of the factors taken into account by the judge in fixing the amount of the fee are the degree of skill and ability exercised by the attorney, the amo
Carriere v. Patient's Care Medical Supply 127 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
After applying the factors set forth in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), , 6 this court raised the attorney fee award from $7,000.00 to $12,000.00 rather than to the amount sought, finding that some of the time spent |1sby the claimant’s attorney “extended an otherwise simple issue and should not be counted toward the overall attorney fee.” “Awards of penalties and attorney’s fees in worke
Jo Ann Lopez v. Isle of Capri Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
John Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/28/00), (citations omitted), stated: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
Lopez v. Isle of Capri Casino 127 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash 126 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Our supreme court, in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, p. 9 (La.11/28/00), (citations omitted), stated: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
Valerie Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/28/00), required the latter remedy.
Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. 124 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 12/12/12) , , this court again addressed the issue of whether the statutory attorney fee should be based on only the time spent on the penalty-related issues or on the entire litigation and concluded that the supreme court decision in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), , required the latter remedy.
Lester Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/28/00), stated: 11 In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc. 115 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
We find that the WCJ erred in limiting this attorney’s fee when she stated, “I award $8,000.00 in attorney’s fees for the items for which claimant prevailed, together with cost of court and interest as provided by law.” Our supreme court, in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, pp. 9-10 (La.11/28/00), , 700 stated: |12In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a *1231 persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculat
Brown v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 118 So. 3d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 p. 5 (La.11/28/00), .
Gary Pickett v. J. B. Tuck Land Clearing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/28/00), (footnote omitted), stating: The only limitation on the amount is the reasonableness of the fee awarded by the judge.
Pickett v. J.B. Tuck Land Clearing 157 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
) and that the workers’ compensation judge should not have awarded attorney fees “for attending me-diations, for drafting, filing and defending a motion for summary judgment that 112was clearly improper and for prosecuting a claim that was clearly barred by res judicata.” The supreme court addressed the award of attorney fees in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, pp. 9-10 (La.11/28/00), (footnote omitted), stating: The only limitation on the amount is the reasonableness of the fee awar
Anthony Kinard v. New Iberia Wastewater Treatment Facility La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Kinard v. New Iberia Wastewater Treatment Facility 116 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, pp. 9-10 (La.11/28/00), .
Vargas v. Petrin Corp. 115 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
23:1201(F)(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Mary O. Simon v. Communications Corp. of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Simon v. Communications Corp. of America 113 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
These factors include “the degree of skill and ability exercised by the attorney, the amount of the claim, the amount recovered for the claimant, and the amount of time the attorney devoted to the case.” Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 01-198, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), , citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Simons v. Brand Staffing Services, Inc. 110 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Magbee v. Federal Express 105 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
He argues that based on his counsels’ affidavits and the holding in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), , he is entitled to recover the entire amount of attorney fees sought, $14,550.00, for the work his counsel put forth in representing his claim.
Paul Magbee v. Federal Express La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
11/28/00), he is entitled to recover the entire amount of attorney fees sought, $14,550.00, for the work his counsel put forth in representing his claim.
Brown v. Offshore Energy Service, Inc. 104 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Robert Minor v. J & J Carpet, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Minor v. J & J Carpet, Inc. 84 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Billy Carrier v. City of Eunice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Carrier v. City of Eunice 80 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
Slade v. State ex rel. University of Louisiana at Monroe 79 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
*470 23:1201(F)(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; J.P.
Donna Tyson v. Thompson Home Health La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011