Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bridgewater, 823 So. 2d 877.

148 citing documents.

State v. Simmons 136 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Webb 133 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529, p. 33 (La.1/15/02), (“animal” and “cold-blooded killerj^on the hunt for prey” did not contribute to the guilty verdict).
State v. Pierre 131 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Absent a justifiable basis, ‘[t]here is no constitutional right to make a new choice of counsel on the very date the trial is to begin, with the attendant necessity of a continuance and its disrupting implications.’ ” State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Allen 126 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529 (La.1/15/02), , the prosecutor made the following remarks during closing argument: Well, he hires himself a good lawyer and he gets a lawyer that’s going to be able to take that intent thing and kind of twist it around and hope that he can play the odds — ...
State v. Elzy 109 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, pp. 17-18 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Pollard 106 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Dexter Holder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/15/02), -95, modified on rehearing, 00-1529 (La.
State v. Holder 101 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, pp. 17-18 (La.1/15/02), -95 , modified on rehearing, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
2242, 2244 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002)); State v. LaCaze, 99-0584 (La.7/25/02), (brother and sister gunned down, along with off-duty police officer working security detail, at family-owned restaurant); State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , reh’g granted, (La.6/15/02), (evidence sufficient to support first degree murder conviction and death sentence for slaying of man and his elderly mother during robbery/burglary of their home); State v. Deal, 00-0434 (La.11/28/01), (2-month-old victim died
State of Louisiana v. Harold Dewayne Baylor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
15:432; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), [State v.] Martin, 00-01489 at p. 1, [(La.
State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Ordesto Marando Toussaint La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Toussaint 94 So. 3d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
[State v.] Bridgewater, [00-1529, p. 17 (La.1/15/02), ,] 894.
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529, p. 10 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
15:432; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), ; Martin, 00-01489 at p. 1, 769 So.2d at 1169; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Ventris 79 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bridgewater, 00- 1529 p. 21 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
33 In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 34 (La.1/15/02), , 903-04 n. 34, cert.
State v. Kimble 62 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529, p. 17 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Johnson 60 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, pp. 13-14, (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529 (La.1/15/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review for claims raising the sufficiency of the evidence as follows: In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we follow the due process standard of review enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Mathieu 49 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Davis 45 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), -904, n. 34 , cert.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), (Victory, Knoll, Weimer, JJ., dissenting with reasons).
State v. Johnson 47 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 34 (La.1/15/02), -904, fn.
State v. Thurman 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Laster 33 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1279 , 167 L.Ed.2d 100 (2007); State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.01/15/02), , cert.
State v. Griffin 30 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State Ex Rel. Tt 30 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, pp. 11-12 (La.1/15/02), , quoting 2 Wayne R. LaFave and Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.7(a)(1986).
State ex rel. T.T. 30 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
As a general rule, “liability [as a principal] will not flow merely from a failure to intervene;” however, “silence in the face of a friend’s crime will sometimes suffice when the immediate proximity of the bystander is such that he could be expected to voice some opposition or surprise if he were not a party to the crime.” State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, pp. 11-12 (La.1/15/02), , quoting 2 Wayne R. LaFave and Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 6.7(a)(1986).
State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1/15/02), , cert, denied, 537 U.S. 1227 , 123 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Oterrel Joseph Boutte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Boutte 27 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Scott 26 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529, p. 8 (La.1/15/2002), .
State v. Greene 26 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, pp. 8-9 (La.1/15/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review for claims challenging the sufficiency of the evidence as follows: In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we follow the due process standard of review enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Edwards 17 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
art. 652; State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Frank, 96-1136 (La.10/4/96), .
State v. QUAC TRAN 18 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529 (La.1/15/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review for claims raising the sufficiency of the evidence as follows: In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we follow the due process standard of review enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Crosby 6 So. 3d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
The supreme court explained the right to self-representation and the review of related trial procedures in State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Stubbs 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/15/02), , for the proposition that "[c]ourts routinely use ex parte proceedings, including situations where counsel provokes a hearing on a motion to withdraw due to `irreconcilable conflict.'" In opposition, the State contends "there is nothing in the original or supplemental record to suggest that there was any type of
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007); State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Franklin 996 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Bridgewater, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/15/02), , and citations therein.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
15:432; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), ; [ State v. ] Martin [, 00-0489,]at p. 1 [(9/22/00)], 769 So.2d [1168] at 1169; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Berry 989 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Lay 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1/15/02), , cert, denied, 537 U.S. 1227 , 123 S.Ct.
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
15:432; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), ; Martin at p. 1 , 769 So.2d at 1169 ; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Lewis 982 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Lewis 982 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Franks 975 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), , cert.
State v. Rick 977 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008