Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Schexnaider, 852 So. 2d 450.

94 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), the defendant argued there was insufficient evidence to convict him due to irreconcilable inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony.
  • State of Louisiana v. Reginald K. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), the minor victim testified that she and the defendant were sitting on the tailgate of the defendant’s truck when he “grabbed her face, kissed her and pushed her onto her back in the bed of his pick-up truck.” The defendant then “g[o]t on top of her”, took off her pants, and penetrated her.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Edwin Albert Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Griffin, 02-1703, pp. 8-10 (La.App.
  • State v. Miller 269 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), , 462 (quoting State v. Griffin , 02-1703, pp. 8-10 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Climes Thibeaux AKA Nathaniel Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), and upheld a conviction for forcible rape when the defendant neither threatened the victim nor had a weapon.
  • State v. Thibeaux 229 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    3 Cir. 6/4/03) , , and upheld a conviction for forcible rape when the defendant neither threatened the victim nor had a weapon.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/12/03), this court reiterated that the trier of fact has the discretion to accept or reject, either partially or wholly, the testimony of any witnesses, including the victim.
  • State v. DeBarge 210 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/4/03) , , this court reiterated that the trier of fact has the discretion to accept or reject, either partially or wholly, the testimony of any witnesses, including the victim.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mary Henderson Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Sims La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/14/03), State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Blunt AKA Steven L. Blunt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), the minor victim testified that she and the defendant were sitting on the tailgate of the defendant’s truck when he “grabbed her face, kissed her and pushed her onto her back in the bed of his pick-up truck.” The defendant then “g[o]t on top of her”, took off her pants, and penetrated her
  • State v. Blunt 201 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), , the minor victim testified that she and the defendant were sitting on the tailgate of the defendant’s truck when he “grabbed her face, kissed her and pushed her onto her back in the bed of his pick-up truck.” The defendant then “g[o]t on top of her”, took off her pants, and penetrated her.- Id.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell Kennedy Mallette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Mallette 193 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State ex rel. Weldon v. State 201 So. 3d 885 La. 2016
    Furthermore, if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Adam Batiste, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Batiste 189 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    App. 3 Cir. 6/4/03), the minor victim testified that she and the defendant were sitting 13 on the tailgate of the defendant’s truck when he “grabbed her face, kissed her and pushed her onto her back in the bed of his pick-up truck.” The defendant then “g[o]t on top of her”, took off her p
  • State v. Carter 160 So. 3d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), , the minor victim testified that she and the defendant were sitting |uon the tailgate of the defendant’s truck when he “grabbed her face, kissed her and pushed her onto her back in the bed of his pick-up truck.” The defendant then “g[o]t on top of her”, took off her pants, and penetrated her.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Urena 161 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Kirk Gaton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), -57 (citations omitted), wherein the defendant asserted there was insufficient evidence that he forcibly raped a minor based on the inconsistencies in the minor victim’s testimony, this court noted: The trial court considered the testimony of all witnesses in this case and made a credibility determi
  • State v. Guillory 129 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), -57 (citations omitted), wherein the defendant asserted there was insufficient evidence that he forcibly raped a minor based on the inconsistencies in the minor victim’s testimony, this court noted: The trial court considered the testimony of all witnesses in this case and made a credibility determination that sho
  • State of Louisiana v. Diondre D. Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Dalcourt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), this court set forth the elements required by La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Willie R. Pitts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), -57 “„[t]he fact that the record contains evidence which conflicts with the testimony accepted by the trier of fact does not render the evidence accepted by the trier of fact insufficient.‟” Also: “[T]he credibility of a witness, including the victim, is within the discretion of the
  • State v. Pitts 87 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), , 456-57 “ ‘[t]he fact that the record contains evidence which conflicts with the testimony accepted by the trier of fact does not render the evidence accepted by the trier of fact insufficient.’ ” Also: “[T]he credibility of a witness, including the victim, is within the discretion of the trier of fact, who may accep
  • State of Louisiana v. Devonta Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. James Stubblefield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell Gene Ware, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
  • State v. Ware 80 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/4/03) , ; State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), this court set forth the elements the state must prove to support a conviction of forcible rape as follows: [I]n order to convict the Defendant, the State had the burden of proving: (1) an act of vaginal or anal intercourse; (2) without the lawful consent of the victim; and (3) where the vic
  • State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), , this court set forth the elements the state must prove to support a conviction of forcible rape as follows: [I]n order to convict the Defendant, the State had the burden of proving: (1) an act of vaginal or anal intercourse; (2) without the lawful consent of the victim; and (3) where the victim is prevented fro
  • State of Louisiana v. C. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), State v. Watson, 39,362 (La.App.
  • State v. C.S. 50 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/4/03) , ; State v. Watson, 39,362 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), State v. Watson, 39,362 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Quentin Truehill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Dean Craig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/4/03), wherein this circuit adopted this analysis as its own.
  • State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/4/03) (quoting State v. Griffin, 02-1703, pp. 8-10 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/4/03) (quoting State v. Griffin, 02-1703, pp. 8-10 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010