Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Warren, 949 So. 2d 1215.

60 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Alexis Michelle Zebley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
2/ 22/ 07), - 26, chin State v. LaRue, 368 So.
State of Louisiana Versus William B Barnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Claiborne S. Gipson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
2/22/07), citing United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S. Ct. 2476, 53 L. Ed. 2d 538 (1977).
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Jackson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana In The Interest of K.B.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Justin Dewayne Kimble La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
2/22/07), (quoting United States v. Saadeh, 61 F.3d 510, 516 (7th Cir. 1995)).
State of Louisiana v. Tremaine Moses La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Tristen J. Lamons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2/22/07), United States v. Kunkler, 679 F.2d 187 (9th Cir.1982).
State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.K. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of K.H. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
0 (" Guns and drugs frequently go hand- in- hand[.]"); Hearold, 603 So.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dupart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
2/22/07), Watts, 17- 0208, p. 6, 223 So.3d at 1190; State v. Kirk, 00-0190, p. 2 (La.
State v. Loicana 254 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/22/07), , 1224 (quoting United States v. Rivera , 248 F.3d 677 , 680-81 (7th Cir.), cert.
State v. Cowans 251 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. McMasters 251 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/22/07), , 1220 (noting that a hand-rolled marijuana cigar is commonly referred to as a "blunt"); State v. Williams , 12-0068, p. 4, n.1 (La.
State v. Salinas 251 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Bates 246 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2/22/07), ; United States v. Kunkler , 679 F.2d 187 (9th Cir.1982).
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Brignac La. 2017
State v. Young 216 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Barnes 203 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2/22/07), ; State v. Chopin, 372 So.2d at 1224 .
State v. Hilton 187 So. 3d 981 La. 2016
There is no compulsion, force or coercion involved in the latter situation.”); see also State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 6 (La.2/22/07), (plurality op’n) (“The prevailing rule is that, absent a clear expression by the owner to the contrary, police officers, in the course of their official | ^business, are permitted to approach one’s dwelling and seek permission to question an occupant.”).
State v. Allen 177 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 18 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Summers 170 So. 3d 960 La. 2015
To determine whether sufficiently exigent circumstances exist to justify a warrantless search or seizure, the court must “consider the totality of the circumstances and the inherent necessities of the situation at the time.” State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 10 (La.2/22/07), (internal quotations omitted).
State v. Robertson 168 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 703D; State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), -26 .
State v. Gross 145 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Jefferson 140 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 5 (La.2/22/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted, “police officer[s], who possess some information that they believe warrants further investigation, but that is insufficient to constitute probable cause for a search warrant, approach the person suspected of engaging in illegal activity at the person’s residence (even knock o
State v. Everett 156 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2041, 2043 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 13 (La.2/22/07), ; State v. Kirk, 00-0190, p. 2 (La.App.
State v. Cole 131 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Guns and drugs frequently go hand-in-hand[.]” State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Lee 124 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Louisiana jurisprudence allows the ‘knock and talk’ approach of police.” State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 6 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Warren, 2005-2248 (La.2/22/07), , the main thrust of the Court’s opinion was the issue of whether the officers were justified in conducting a warrantless search of a duffel bag found in a hotel room that the officers entered.
State v. Lewis 121 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 18 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Carter 112 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In determining whether sufficient exigent circumstances exist to justify a warrantless entry and search or seizure, the court must “consider the totality of the circumstances and the ‘inherent necessities of the situation at the time.’” State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 10 (La.2/22/07), (Citation omitted).
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 14 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. $144,320.00 Tina Beers 105 So. 3d 694 La. 2012
In the context of warrantless searches and seizures, the Court has defined probable cause as “reasonable grounds for belief, supported by less than prima facie proof but more than mere suspicion.” State v. Warren, 2005-2248, p. 10 (La.2/22/07), (citing United States v. Bennett, 905 F.2d 931, 934 (6th Cir.1990); United States v. Ferguson, 8 F.3d 385, 391-92 (6th Cir.1993)).
State v. Durham 107 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
2130 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993); State v. Warren, 2005-2248 (La.02/22/07), ; State v. Burney, (La.App.2d Cir.05/23/12), .
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2/22/07), -22 (emphasis added).
State v. Collins 101 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Warren, 05-2248, pp. 6-7 (La.2/22/07), -22 (emphasis added).
State v. Gibson 103 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In determining whether sufficient exigent circumstances exist to justify the war-rantless entry and search or seizure, the court must “consider the totality' of the circumstances and the ‘inherent necessities of the situation at the time.’ ” State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), (quotation omitted).
State v. Carter 96 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 18 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Cortez 98 So. 3d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Warren, 05-2248 p. 10 (La.2/22/07), (quotation omitted).
State v. Roberson 81 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Leonard 80 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 18 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. SURTAIN 31 So. 3d 1037 La. 2010
State v. Warren, 2005-2248 p. 8 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Marks 28 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Warren, 05-2248, pp. 6-7 (La.2/22/07), ; State v. Haywood, 00-1584, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 2/22/07), ("After making an arrest, an officer has the right to much more thoroughly search a defendant ...
State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), , the Court set forth the *625 applicable law on the warrantless entry of a dwelling by police, as follows: Police generally need a warrant to enter a home, but “warrantless searches will be allowed when police have a reasonable belief that exigent circumstances require immediate action and there is no time to secure
State v. Ayo 7 So. 3d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), .
State v. Rector 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/22/07), -30 (footnote omitted), the supreme court discussed searches incident to arrest as follows: In Thornton v. United States, 541 U.S. 615 , 124 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Melvin E. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/22/07), -26 (first alteration in original; footnotes, case citations, and parentheticals omitted).