Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co., 779 So. 2d 704.

48 citing documents.

Lanell E. Darouse v. P.J.'s Coffee of New Orleans, LLC and New Orleans Roast, LLC La. 2025
2/21/01), -11, to ensure “the avoidance of stale claims.” Procedural laws are “to be construed liberally, and with due regard for the fact that rules of procedure implement the substantive law,” and they are not “an end in themselves.” La.
Brianne Vilardo Rogers Versus Aaron M. Griffin, N.P. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
2/21/01), and Lott v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, 98-1920 (La.
Ashley N. Miller and Drusilla Parker v. Joseph P. Hirstius and American Alternative Insurance Corporation La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
2/ 21/ 01), ("[ I] t is well -accepted that even a defendant' s actual knowledge of a legal action cannot supply the want of citation because proper citation is the foundation of all actions.")).
Anthony Phillip Girouard, Jr. v. Sue Taylor Girouard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
2/21/01), the plaintiff argued that, although their service on the defendant was delayed, the opposing party was not prejudiced because they had knowledge of the suit.
Mary Sue Wilson v. State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Lou-Con, Inc. v. Trans-Vac Systems, LLC and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Co. 00-1585, p. 9 (La.2/21/01)
Eugene v. Duroncelet 275 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Lois Eugene Versus Brett Duroncelet, Waste Connection, Inc., and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Stemcor USA Incorporated v. Cia Siderurgica Do Para Cosipar La. 2019
Charles W. Kouba and Jeri S. Kouba v. City of Natchitoches La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
For example, in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), the plaintiff argued that, although their service on the defendant was delayed, the opposing party was not prejudiced because they had knowledge of the suit.
Jones v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 213 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2017
2/21/01), [emphasis added].
Alton Leon Fields, Sr. v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
For example, in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), the plaintiff argued that, although their service on the defendant was delayed, the opposing party was not prejudiced because they had knowledge of the suit.
Maretta Benoit v. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Marcile v. Dauzat 103 So. 3d 335 La. 2012
Cf. Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585, p. 5 (La.2/21/01); (“No one has a vested right in any given mode of procedure.”); Blanchard , 95-2011 at 13; 674 So.2d at 325 (“There is [not], nor has there ever been, a vested right not to have a jury trial in a civil case, unless the jury trial is expressly not available under existing law.”); Adams , 95-2515 at 17; 673 So.2d at
Morales v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors 104 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 2000-1585, p. 8 (La.2/21/01), .
Hunter v. Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College ex rel. Louisiana Health Care Services Center for University … 77 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Paul Travelers Insurance Company, 2011-0124, p. 2 (La.4/4/11), (citing Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585, p. 8 (La.2/21/01), ).
Igbinoghene v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance Co. 58 So. 3d 452 La. 2011
See Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 at p. 8 (La.2/21/01), (“it is well-accepted that even a defendant’s actual knowledge of a legal action cannot supply the want of citation because proper citation is the foundation of all actions”).
Burge v. State 43 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), .
State Ex Rel. Hmd 26 So. 3d 129 La. 2010
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 at p. 8 (La.2/21/01), .
State ex rel. H.M.D. 26 So. 3d 129 La. 2010
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 at p. 8 (La.2/21/01), .
Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
Co. 00-1585, p. 9 (La.2/21/01), , citing Backhus v. Transit Cas.
Wilbert Curry v. Javell McGinnis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/21/01), ]” The trial court even quoted numerous “head notes” from Naquin in its Reasons for Judgment.
Curry v. McGinnis 3 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In its Reasons for Judgment, the trial court declared that it was “particularly impressed with the Supreme Court decision in Naquin [v.] Titan Indemnity Co., [00-1585 (La.2/21/01), .]” The trial court even quoted numerous “head notes” from Naquin in its Reasons for Judgment.
Tranchant v. State 5 So. 3d 832 La. 2009
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585, p. 8 (La.2/21/01), .
Thorning v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 934 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., 2000-1585, p. 9 (La.2/21/01), .
Thorning v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 934 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.2/21/01), .
Tellis v. Lincoln Parish Police Jury 916 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), .
Jenkins v. Larpenter 906 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585, p. 9 (La.2/21/01), .
Taylor v. LSU Medical Center 892 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), .
Kimball v. Wausau Ins. Companies 892 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), .
Shirley Gauthier v. Newty Paul Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2/21/01), the plaintiff argued that, although their service on the defendant was delayed, the opposing party was not prejudiced because they had knowledge of the suit.
W & R Farming Partnership v. Old South Properties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2/21/01), Kimball v. Kimball, 93-1364, p. 3 (La.App.
W & R Farming Partnership v. Old South Properties, Inc. 887 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 6/25/03), , citing Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), ; Kimball v. Kimball, 93-1364, p. 3 (La.App.
Gauthier v. Gauthier 886 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
For example, in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), , the plaintiff argued that, although their service on the defendant was delayed, the opposing party was not prejudiced because they had knowledge of the suit.
Bozeman v. State 879 So. 2d 692 La. 2004
Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., et al., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), .
Followed Lockett v. Reese 874 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 864 So. 2d 117 La. 2004
Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), .
Arn Smith and Deidre Bell Smith v. City of Lake Charles Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2/21/01), in which the supreme court held that the ninety day service rule provided to a governmental entity by La.R.S.
Smith v. City of Lake Charles Police Department 858 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
That reasoning was recently applied with approval in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), , in which the supreme court held that the ninety day service rule provided to a governmental entity by La.R.S.
Johnson v. Brown 851 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
In Naquin v. Titan Indem.Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), , in an automobile collision personal injury action against government defendants, La.
OBrien v. Lee 849 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), , plaintiffs suit had been filed after May 9, 1996, but before January 1, 1998.
Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 846 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
The plaintiff in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01); , made an argument analogous to that made here by plaintiffs regarding the effect of reenacting a statute.
Davis v. HUEY P. LONG REGIONAL MEDICAL 841 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
As explained by the Supreme Court in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585, pp. 9-10, (La.2/21/01); , 710: While it is this court's province to "consider the reason and spirit of a law," we are "not free to rewrite the law to effect a purpose that is not otherwise expressed."
Langlois v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 827 So. 2d 1123 La. 2002
Relying on Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/01), , 7 the court of appeal held that defendants’ admission that the School Board had knowledge of the claim for damages and the plaintiffs allegation that the School Board’s adjuster had a copy of the petition do not excuse plaintiff from the requirement to timely request service.
Vicedomini v. Pelts & Skins 808 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), , appears the following: Plaintiff's initial claim is that defendants' knowledge of the pending suit obviated the need for service of citation.
Langlois v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 809 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
The court denied the motion, noting “constitutionality not considered in accordance with Supreme Court Order of remand.” DISCUSSION In a recent case, Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585, pp. 2-3 (La.2/21/01), *278 , suit was filed on March 17, 1997, ten months after the effective date of La.
Johnson v. Regional Transit Authority 785 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Moreover, under the Louisiana Supreme Court’s recent decision in Naquin v. Titan Indemnity Co., 00-1585 (La.2/21/00), , the Johnsons’ argument that their expectation of settlement with Direct General constituted good cause for their failure to comply with the requirements of LSA-R.S.
Sam v. Feast 802 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1st Cir.5/12/00), , aff'd, 00-1585 pp. 2-3 (La.2/21/01), , suit was filed on March 17, 1997, ten months after the effective date of La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by