Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

  • State v. Standfill 15 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Triggs 16 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Yates 15 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Montelbano 15 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    See State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; State v. Weaver, 01-0467 (La.01/15/02)
  • State v. Deen 16 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Hotard 17 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Shaw 15 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Collins 12 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Prine 13 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/08)
  • State v. Cheatham 12 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Howard 13 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Harvey 12 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    The standard for evaluation in a claim for an excessive sentence is set forth in State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), : Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
  • State v. Hanson 12 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; 6
  • State v. Black 12 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Brown 12 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Coffman 13 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; *728
  • State v. Hill 12 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cheatham 12 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Caffrey 15 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.
  • State v. Perry 9 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), .” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (L
  • State v. Anderson 6 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. McCALMAN 7 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, ┴32001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Tomlinson 8 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Thornton 8 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Hicks 7 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Allen Jermaine Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ” State v.
  • State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “In State v. Smith,, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), .” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12 (L
  • State v. Jones 7 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o late shall subject any person to ...
  • State v. Ferguson 4 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Tellis 5 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Reed 4 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Addison 10 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Lewis 4 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Mansell 4 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), .
  • State v. Ambeau 6 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. George 4 So. 3d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
  • State v. Alexander 2 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Jamerson 1 So. 3d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Speed 2 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jackson 1 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Johnson 2 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Holland 2 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Williams 8 So. 3d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Ridgley 7 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , citing State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ; and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Warren 2 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Bedoya 998 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Lewis 1 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/02), .