Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

State v. Cooper 32 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Davidson 32 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Hyman 33 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Tate 33 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Laster 33 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Burns 32 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v.Bonanno
State v. Stutts 26 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, 623 So.
State v. Allen 30 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Hicks 30 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. McKEAVER 32 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Holden 30 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Autry 30 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Wallace 31 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Lewis 31 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Wolff 30 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Wiltz 28 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard to be used in evaluating a claim of an excessive sentence.
State v. Washington 26 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Cox 26 So. 3d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Noble 26 So. 3d 924 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Haynes 26 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Washington 26 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Collins 30 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Duncan 28 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
This Court further noted that in State v. Smith, 01-2574, (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years were found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery.
State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Roberts 26 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), .
State v. Webster 26 So. 3d 208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; *210
State v. Richie 25 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Marshall 26 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Falcon 26 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Bernard 26 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Wilson 26 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, supra.
State v. Martorana 27 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Anderson 28 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1/14/08), (Citation omitted).
State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Redfearn 22 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 *1057 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Burton 22 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Stale v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, *1071
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
State v. Clark 16 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Morgan 16 So. 3d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Scott 17 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. SARRETT 17 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; State v. *1058 Bonanno, State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.05/12/04), ; State v. Robinson, 40,983 (La.App.2d Cir.01/24/07), .
State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ••• excessive ••• punishment.” (Emphasis added).
State v. Bell 16 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, pp. 6-7, (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentencing: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ...