Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 837 So. 2d 1207.

250 citing documents.

Williams v. Wood 258 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
an Erny Girl, L. L.C. v. Bcno 4 L. L.C. 257 So. 3d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Mosk 257 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Rourke v. Estate of Dretar 248 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Interdiction Zimmer 242 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Helen Moore v. MacQuarie Infrastructure Real Assets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
art. 927(A)(4) and (5); Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03)
Moore v. Macquarie Infrastructure Real Assets 258 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
art. 927(A)(4) and (5) ; Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin , 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03); , 1212.
Taxicab Insurance Store, LLC v. American Service Insurance Co. 224 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Gbb Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
GBB Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC 224 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
J. A. Davis Properties, LLC v. Martin Operating Partnership, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Semco, LLC v. Grand Ltd. 221 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Dillon v. Toys R Us-Delaware Corp. 221 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/28/03), (citations omitted).
New Jax Condominiums Ass'n v. Vanderbilt New Orleans, LLC 219 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Frankowski v. Frankowski 214 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Coleman v. Querbes Co. No. 1 218 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1/28/03), ; Hall v. James, 43,263 (La.App.
N. Clark, L.L.C. v. Chisesi 206 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/28/03), (citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm’n, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.
Michael Carl Clary, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/28/03), “[e]very reasonable interpretation must be accorded the language of the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” Because the peremptory exception of no cause of action “raises a question of law and the lower court‟s
Clary v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 204 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/28/03), , “[e]very reasonable interpretation must be accorded the language of the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” Because the peremptory exception of no cause of action “raises a question of law and the lower court’s decision
Kennedy v. Saheid 209 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Robinson v. Wayne & Beverly Papania & Pyrenees Investments, LLC 207 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. 208 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Mary Andree Peltier v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Watson v. Franklin 198 So. 3d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
art. 681; Industrial Companies Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.01/28/03), ; Hubbard v. Carroll, 49,879 (La.App.2d Cir.08/19/15), .
Clayton v. Cannizzaro 197 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), .
Rountree v. Forsythe Holdings, Inc. 196 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The 1995 amendments to Louisiana’s joinder articles eliminated the categories of “indispensable parties” and “necessary parties” in favor of a single category of “parties needed for just adjudication.” Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Zeigler v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 192 So. 3d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), .
Leeanna Anthony v. Blakes Auto Sales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/28/03), succinctly stated the standard of review that must be employed by this court in an appellate review of the trial court’s ruling granting a peremptory exception of no cause of action pursuant to La.Code Civ.P.
Brown v. Brown 187 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Accordingly, “[e]very reasonable ^interpretation must be accorded the language used in the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 050719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), (citing Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), ).
LeBlanc v. Alfred 185 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 927(A)(6); see also, *774 Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Alfonso Haybeych v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank Na La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted).
Haybeych v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n 180 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted).
No Drama, LLC v. Caluda 177 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Hubbard v. Carroll 174 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
art. 681; Industrial Companies Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), ; Chisley v. Smith, 43,312 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), .
Moses v. Moses 174 So. 3d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Accordingly, “[e]very reasonable interpretation must be accorded the language used in the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 050719, p. 7 (La.3/17/06), (citing Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), ).
Simmons v. State, Department of Children & Family Services 171 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Applicable Law “Simply stated, a petition should not be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action unless it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of any claim which would entitle him to relief.” Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted).
State ex rel. K.C.C. 171 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Cos. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie 167 So. 3d 573 La. 2015
See also Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), , 1217 n. 6 (“The 1995 amendments to Louisiana’s joinder articles, La.Code of Civ.
Whitlock v. Fifth Louisiana District Levee Board 164 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Olympia Minerals, LLC v. H. S. Resources, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Industrial Cos. Inc. V. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 12 ( 1/28/03), (citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Comm’n, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.
Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc. 162 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Industrial Cos. Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 12 ((La.]1/28/03), (citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Comm’n, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.11/30/94), ).
James Michael Owens v. State of Louisiana D/B/A Louisiana Community and Technical College System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03)
Owens v. State 157 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), .
Sullivan v. Malta Park 156 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), ; Insulation Technologies, Inc. v. Indus.
Lott v. Mahalia Jackson Residual Family Corp. XYZ Shareholders & XYZ Directors 153 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), ).
Monroe Surgical Hospital, LLC v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 147 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 681; Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Rigaud v. DeRuise 141 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“The peremptory exception |Bof no cause of action is designed to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the particular plaintiff is afforded a remedy in law based on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
Clulee v. St. Pierre 142 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
Gettys v. Wong 145 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“A person should be deemed needed for just adjudication only when absolutely necessary to protect substantial rights.” Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 14 (La.1/28/03), .
Susan Arnaud, Et Ux. v. Ronald Dies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014