DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 837 So. 2d 1207.

250 citing documents.

  • John C. Duck v. Hunt Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    1/28/03), (citations omitted).
  • Duck v. Hunt Oil Co. 134 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, pp. 11-12 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted).
  • Branch v. Young 136 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03); .
  • Wells v. Fandal 136 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir.1969) (where director’s term of office had expired and new election held, plaintiff had no right of action for quo warranto as it was moot); Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 01-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • New Orleans Craft Temple, Inc. v. Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons 131 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Weber v. Metropolitan Community Hospice Foundation, Inc. 131 So. 3d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 11 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Lemmon Law Firm, LLC v. School Board of the Parish of St. Charles 131 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), ; Cleco Corp., 01-175 at 3, 795 So.2d at 304 .
  • Robert Hollier v. Louis J. Perret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    1/28/03), “[e]very reasonable interpretation must be accorded the language of the petition in favor of maintaining its sufficiency and affording the plaintiff the opportunity of presenting evidence at trial.” In his petition, Mr. Hollier asserted that the Notice of Lis Pendens at issue “falsely asserted
  • Llopis v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry 121 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Humble v. Pafford EMS 116 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Cleco Corp. v. Johnson, 2001-0175 (La.9/18/01), ; Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Animal Legal Defense Fund v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 140 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. 681; see also Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Bobby C. Moore v. Succession of Patricia Gay Bruce Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    1/28/03), (citations omitted).
  • Moore v. Succession of Moore 116 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Its function is “to question whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.” Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted).
  • Blanchard v. Blanchard 112 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    art. 681; Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Brednich v. Bourbon Nite-Life, LLC 108 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 11 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Bougere v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. 105 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Sheets Family Partners-Louisiana, Ltd. v. Inner City Refuge Economic Development Corp. 94 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    See Industrial Companies, Inc. v. *972 Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Wilson v. Allums 94 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Raspanti v. Litchfield 89 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Industrial Companies v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), .
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Coard 88 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The exception of no cause of action should be granted only when “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of any claim that would entitle him to relief.” Industrial 4Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), ; Barrie v. V.P.
  • Friel v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance 85 So. 3d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    This Court relied on the Louisiana Supreme court case Industrial Co., Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, (La.1/28/03), , wherein it reasoned: [t]he function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • C.D.J. & B.M.A.J. v. Applying for Intra-Family Adoption of P.L.A. & D.T.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Brielles Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Teche, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Brielle's Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Tech, Inc. 74 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 927(A)(4) and (5); Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03); .
  • Cdj v. Bca 74 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • C.D.J. v. B.C.A. 74 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. Smith 71 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 2/6/08) , , writ denied, 08-530 (La.4/25/08), ; see also Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Cadle Co. v. Henson 57 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Mentz Construction Services, Inc. v. Poche 54 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), ; Cleco Corp. v. Johnson, 01-0175, p. 3 (La.9/18/01), .
  • Wagoner v. CHEVRON USA INC. 55 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.01/28/03), ; Cleco Corp. v. Johnson, 01-0175 (La.09/18/01), .
  • Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 11 (LA.1/28/03), Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 4 (La.11/30/94)
  • Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 11 (LA.1/28/03), Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 4 (La.11/30/94)
  • David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 11 (LA.1/28/03), ; Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015, p. 4 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Commission 44 So. 3d 272 La. 2010
    art. 927; Reese v. State Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 03-1615, pp. 2-3 (La.2/20/04), ; Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 11-12 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    Co., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), , quoting La.
  • DiLeo v. Hansen 45 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Ratliff v. LSU Board of Supervisors 38 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Parker v. INFLOW PETROLEUM RESOURCE, LP 30 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1/28/03), , the rationale of using "no right of action" exceptions.
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Jimmy Charles Bosley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Bosley 30 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Doughty v. Cummings 28 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Heine v. Reed 28 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), ; Cleco Corp. v. Johnson, 01-0175, p. 3 (La.9/18/01), .
  • Wade P. Richard v. Daniel G. Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Exception of No Cause of Action For Civil Trespass The Louisiana Supreme Court in Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), articulated the function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action: First, we focus on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant in this case.
  • Richard v. Richard 24 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Exception of No Cause of Action For Civil Trespass The Louisiana Supreme Court in Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), , articulated the function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action: First, we focus on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant in this case.
  • Succession of Duke 16 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • O'DWYER v. Edwards 15 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    Co., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Wakefield v. Kyle 12 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Fund, 07-2224 (La.7/1/08), ; Reese v. State Dep’t of Public Safety and Corrections, 03-1615 (La.2/20/04), ; Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Robin Poole v. Wendell E. Poole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    1/28/03), (citations omitted), the supreme court explained: The exception is triable on the face of the petition and, for the purpose of determining the issues raised by the exception, the well-pleaded facts in the petition must be accepted as true.
  • Poole v. Poole 7 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted), the supreme court explained: The exception is triable on the face of the petition and, for the purpose of determining the issues raised by the exception, the well-pleaded facts in the petition must be accepted as true.
  • Kelley v. Dyson 10 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002- *287 0665, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), .