Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bourgeois v. Kost, 846 So. 2d 692.

68 citing documents.

Tri County Tree Service, LLC Versus Kevin Matherne La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Bryan Arnold Richman, Jr. v. the Travelers Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03)
In Re: Interdiction of Gloria Lanasa Raspanti La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Dept. of Children & Family Services Versus Denzel Ridley La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Riley Lee Calhoun v. Roy T. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/20/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “[La.C.C.P.
Kira Reaver v. Degas House, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana, Through Its Department of Transportation and Development v. Ruvim Kimakovkiy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/20/03), -96: [Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure] Article 1951 contemplates the correction of a “clerical error” in a final judgment, but does not authorize substantive amendments.
Leaser Crockett v. Tarchia Lollis, Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, and Geico General Insurance Company (uninsured/underinsured and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Lora Pitre Versus Louisiana Thoroughbred Breeders Association, Warren Harang, III, Jake Delhomme, Daniel Guidry, Val Murrell, David Tillson, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
IN RE: Atakapa Indian de creole Nation Also Known as "Tribe of Moses" Express Spendthrift Trust La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Wells Fargo Financial Louisiana, Inc. Versus Zoie Breaux Bordelon A/K/A Zoie B, Bordelon A/K/A Zoie Bordelon, Ernest Bordelon, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Raeven Duncan v. Brett Gauthier, Brett Gauthier's Auto Sales, Collision Specialties, Inc., and Houston Speciailty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Kenneth M. Dean v. Anthony Dimattia, also known as Anthony Paul Miller La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Trunod Demarco Rogers v. Tonya Renae Morgan Rogers La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
George W. Wolfe II v. Lindsey Renee Breaud La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
5/ 20/ 03), Horrell v. Barrios, 2016- 1547 ( La.
Gerald J. Calogero v. USA Agencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Avery Dickens, II. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/20/03), Perrodin v. S. Siding Co., Inc., (La.App.
Allen McMillian v. Michael Breen La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Lobell v. Denn 263 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Bernhard MCC, LLC v. Zeringue 250 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Buhler 243 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/20/03), , 696 and McGee v. Wilkinson, 03-1178 (La.App.
Cooper v. Patra 215 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
05/20/03), ; Lirette v. Wickramasekera, 08-0575 (La.
Cantu v. Schlumberger 197 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
art.1951 and Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .
Condon v. Logan 190 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 5/20/03), ;’ see also Bates v. City of New Orleans, 13-1153, pp. 13-14 (La.
Gloria Welch v. Southwind Nursing & Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Welch v. Southwind Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 177 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), .
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
■ In support of their arguments, Kenner Plumbing and MCC cite the Louisiana Su *496 preme Court’s decision in Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), , and this Court’s decision in Madere v. St.
James E. Stewart, Sr. v. Dianne Denley Stewart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hebert v. 25 Hebert, Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 26 (La.5/20/03)
Stewart v. Stewart 166 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
LaBove v. Theriot, 597 S6.2d 1007, 1010 (La.1992); Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), .
Cupp Drug Store, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana, Inc. 161 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
art. 1951, which states, in part, that “[o]n motion of the court or any party, a final judgment may be amended at any time to alter the phraseology of the judgment, but not its substance, or to correct errors of calculation.” In support of its argument, Blue Cross quotes a passage from Bourgeois v. Kost, 2002-2785, pp. 7-8 (La.5/20/03), , 696: Without a specific statutory grant of authority, the trial court is limited to the general authorization for amending final judgments provided in Code of
Wells v. Wells 150 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .
Bates v. City of New Orleans 137 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
• “The trial judge cannot, on his own motion or on the motion of any party, change a judgment which has been so signed, notwithstanding it was signed in error.” Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 7 (La.5/20/03), (citing State ex rel.
Clarence M. Leland v. Lafayette Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Leland v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 124 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), .
Sanderford v. Mason 135 So. 3d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .
Thomas v. Williams 115 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
LaBove, supra; Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .
Midland Funding, LLC v. Cady 110 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
art.2088; Bourgeois v. Kost, 2002-2785 (La.5/20/03), ; Winston v. Martin, 34,195 (La.App.
Peters v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 52 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bourgeois v. Kost, 2002-2785, p. 7 (La.5/20/03), .
Input/Output Marine Systems, Inc. v. Wilson Greatbatch, Technologies, Inc. 52 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See: Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), ("The proper recourse for an error of substance within a judgment is a timely application for new trial or a timely appeal.'').
Lloyd Bordelon v. Howard J. Desselle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Suprun v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 40 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .
Stanford H. McNabb v. Therese Herrig McNabb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Audubon Orthopedic & Sports Medicine, APMC v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Denton v. State Farm, 08-0483, p. 7 (La.12/12/08), (citing Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), ).
Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Zip Tube System of Louisiana, Inc. 30 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Burger contends that the fact that the trial court was correcting an error has no legal significance, relying on Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .
Lirette v. Wickramasekera 13 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Bourgeois v. Kost, 2002-2785, p. 7-8 (La.5/20/03) ; see also Levron v. State Through Dept. of Health & Hospitals 94-2094 (La.App.
O'BRIEN v. Hoff 10 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/21/99), , writ denied, 00-1210 (La.6/2/00), , (in which a panel of this Court held that because the amended judgment granted plaintiff the additional relief of a money judgment, it clearly altered the substance of the original judgment and was therefore invalid.); See also, Bougeois v. Kent, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), , (in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court was without authority to amend a judgment to restate the damage award although the original judgment wa
Adam v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 5 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As the proper recourse for an error of substance within a judgment is a timely application for new trial, or in this case, a timely appeal, Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), , we will amend the first judgment signed by the trial court to reflect the granting of the motion to tax costs in favor of the plaintiffs.
Adam v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 5 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As the proper recourse for an error of substance within a judgment is a timely application for new trial, or in this case, a timely appeal, Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785, p. 5 (La.5/20/03), , we will amend the first judgment signed by the trial court to reflect the granting of the motion to tax costs in favor of the plaintiffs.
Denton v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 998 So. 2d 48 La. 2008
Bourgeois v. Kost, 02-2785 (La.5/20/03), .