DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Burguieres v. Pollingue, 843 So. 2d 1049.

217 citing documents.

  • RJAM, Inc. v. Miletello 103 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    13:4231; Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Wilson v. Allums 94 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Burguieres v. Pol *914 lingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Richland Parish Police Jury v. Debnam 92 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    13:4231; Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.02/25/03), .
  • Pierrotti v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Kimberly Crittenden Daigle v. Merrill Lynch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2/25/03), In re Succession of Carlton, 11-288 (La.App.
  • Daigle v. Lynch 85 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), ; In re Succession of Carlton, 11-288 (La.App.
  • Succession of Donnie Dewayne Carlton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Succession of Carlton 77 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Pal v. Stranco, Inc. 76 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Stall v. Bakery Condominium Ass'n 66 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2 In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), , the Supreme Court set forth five elements to satisfy to determine if res judicata applies to a second lawsuit: (1) is the judgment from the first action valid; (2) is that |,.judgment final; (3) are the parties the same; (4) did the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit exist at the time of the final
  • Rapides Parish Police Jury v. Thomas Reich La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Rapides Parish Police Jury v. Catahoula Boys Hunting and Social Club, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Rapides Parish Police Jury v. Richard E. Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Landry v. Town of Livingston Police Department 54 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Flanigan v. City of Shreveport 50 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • A & B Bolt & Supply, Inc. v. David S. Dawes. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p.8 (La.2/25/03)
  • A & B Bolt & Supply, Inc. v. Dawes 49 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Myers v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 43 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated that “the chief inquiry is whether the second action asserts a cause of action which arises out of the same transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first action.” Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • VON DRAKE v. Rogers 36 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    v. State, 07-2469 (La.9/8/08), , citing, Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), ; Jones v. Bethard, 39,575 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/05), , writ denied, 05-1519 (La.12/16/05), .
  • Roy P. Riche, Jr. v. Faye Thevenot Riche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Riche v. Riche 34 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Jefferson Marine Towing, Inc. v. Kostmayer Construction, LLC 32 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    14 On appeal, the Plaintiff asserts that the trial judge erred in failing to apply the Louisiana law of res judicata, and in particular, Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • DeMARCO v. DAVID BRIGGS ENTERPRISES, INC. 30 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    13:4231 10 ; Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03)
  • Blount Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Williams 26 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.02/25/03), .
  • Williams v. Orleans Levee District & Its Board of Commissioners 24 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Hines v. Smith 16 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit arose out of the transaction or occurrence that *1239 was the subject matter of the first litigation.” Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, 2007-2469 (La.9/8/08), , 194 quoting, Bu rguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Insurance Co. of North America v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 10 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit arose out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first litigation.” Bur-guieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 999 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) the cause or causes of action asserted *1194 in the second suit arose out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first litigation.” Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Holzenthal v. SWB OF NEW ORLEANS 999 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Austin v. Markey 2 So. 3d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, 07-2469 (La.9/8/08), ; Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, (La.2/25/03), .
  • T.P. Homes, Inc. v. Taylor 1 So. 3d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit arose out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first litigation.” Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Lozier v. Estate of Elmer 996 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Chevron USA, Inc. v. State 993 So. 2d 187 La. 2008
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Chevron USA, Inc. v. State 972 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, pp. 7-8 (La.2/25/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The civilian concept of res judicata is based upon a presumption of correctness.
  • Smith v. LeBlanc 966 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Haren 957 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/25/03), .
  • Peeler v. Dural 958 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [3] In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), , 1053 the Supreme Court set forth five criteria that must be met for a matter to be considered res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation
  • Hawthorne v. Couch 946 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/25/03), .
  • Classen v. Hofmann 947 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), , the Supreme Court set forth five criteria that must be met for a matter to be considered res judicata.
  • Kenneth Paul Daigle v. Kimberly Crittenden Daigle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Linda Simmons-Iturralde v. Manuel R. Iturralde La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2/25/03), : [A] second action is precluded when all of the following are satisfied: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5
  • Daigle v. Daigle 940 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • North Amer. Treat. Sys. v. Scottsdale Ins. 943 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), , the supreme court reviewed the history of res judicata in Louisiana.
  • Horacek v. Watson 934 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Having found that Horacek's present claim is not barred by the doctrine of res judicata, this court need not address Appellant's alternative argument that the present action lacks an "identity of parties" as required by Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03) .
  • Melissa Horacek v. Davelyn Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Having found that Horacek’s present claim is not barred by the doctrine of res judicata, this court need not address Appellant’s alternative argument that the present action lacks an “identity of parties” as required by Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03)
  • Sours v. Kneipp 923 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), ; Jones v. Bethard, 39,575 (La.App.2d Cir.4/13/05), .
  • John Aaron Duhon v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    2/25/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the revisions to the res judicata statute and the requirements for finding a suit is barred by res judicata.
  • Duhon v. Lafayette Consol. Government 918 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the revisions to the res judicata statute and the requirements for finding a suit is barred by res judicata.
  • Andrews v. Trans Union Corp. 917 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/25/03), .
  • P. Charles Calahan v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005